this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
603 points (98.4% liked)
196
17133 readers
2408 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts require verification from the mods first
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Gay sex is limitless compared to straight sex because they don’t stack infinitely.
Unless the gals wear strap-ons and the guys are into pegging.
You can have an infinite series of straight, stacked fuckers, you just have to constrain 'straight' by the condition 'sufficiently kinky'.
OwO to the first paragraph. Can someone explain the second?
I'm mixing up some loose mathematical / set theory vocabulary with imagery of a sexy time.
If you have an infinite number of gay men with dicks in other men's butts, stacked, in sequence, on an infinite sized floor or bed...
The straight version of this is guy gal guy gal pairs forever, with the gals having strap-ons in the guys asses, and the guys having their dicks in I guess either the gals pinks or stinks.
A 'constraint' is very loosely in set theory / math terms ... basically a way of saying... these formulas work, this equation has existing solutions, but only if we 'constrain' some of the factors.
So I am 'constraining' the vast amounts of people who are just straight, to people who are straight and also kinky enough to jump into the strap on / pegging conga line.
Unironically, that doesn't involve any homo, as no gals are touching gals, and no guys are touching guys.
EDIT: Its sort of a very simple kind of aperiodic tiling.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperiodic_tiling
Why, yes, I am both autistic and have a dirty mind, how could you tell?
I'm giving you Lemmy gold
Beans please.
We do beans around here, apparently, rofl.
I think I misunderstood the original comment. I retract my previous statement.
i knew it, i felt it, sp3ctr4l is a reference to Spectral Theorem. Every real, symmetric matrix is diagonalizable.
Picturing the resonance of the human sexipede is funny to me.
The human sexipede
I wonder what would happen if they made a loop.
Would they be stuck like that?
A risk I’m willing to take
Ah the mythical Ouroboros of Pegging.
for science!
Now this is science I can get behind! Let's get someone behind me!
How many guys does it take? Some group must have attempted this at a fur con room party or something. 2 - 4 would be too few, 5 might be where it starts to be possible but very uncomfortable. I think about the 8 - 10 person range would be the sweet spot. We need our ~~top~~ switch scientists researching this at once!
Maybe we haven't heard of successful attempts because it's like when ants get stuck in a loop.