It does, but not every account is worth it

There are drugs that can but most drug companies don't want their product to be associated with death.

Death row: The secret hunt for lethal drugs used in US executions

More than 60 global pharmaceutical companies won't allow their drugs to be used in capital punishment.

It honestly wouldn't suprise me if there was some product placement

They want project strength and please their followers with blood, like the public executions in the middle ages

Distro that is basically an Arch rice with some AI. The creator (DHH) is the most controversial aspect

I think the fact it's statically linked plays a role. Common licences like the LGPL won't work, leaving the MPL or the less similar but more commonly known MIT license

I think they're confusing it with capped cellular data usage

This isn't explicitly political content, but the intent is clear

There is something like that called Plebbit, it's a good example of all the downsides of such a system.

It's decentralized and "censorship proof" AKA completely unmoderated with all the spamming and unsavory content one might expect. The CSAM issue is mostly avoided because it doesn't support any kind of media sharing (only plain text) due to the bandwidth for P2P connections and avoiding having to store that on the client. Last time I checked content also simply disappears when users disconnect.

The federated system is better because it's more efficient and scales better since only a couple hundred instances have to send/receive activity instead of hundred thousands of users individually. It also helps ensure content is moderated. Admins tend to keep their own instance clean and defederate from instances that don't.

Could you elaborate in which way you consider this to be political? The reference to the "war fighter" which mirrors the current administration's rethoric?

How does this work? Is there a 360° video format?

Did you see the examples at 28:30? Those things can't be done yet.