this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
1150 points (97.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

6518 readers
4261 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (6 children)

Accuracy of this post aside, would anyone be surprised if many of the cartel leaders are on a cia payroll?

I am not alleging that to be any truth, but i would digest that information like a weather report claiming rain when you’re still soaking wet from having been outside.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

They almost certainly are to some extent. That being said no cartel works for the CIA. The CIA isn’t nearly as good at espionage as some think.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

At this point in history, yes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago

I would be surprised if they weren't on the CIA payroll.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

This is the plot of Iron Man

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The last thing the working classes of the world needs is for the owner class to have a monopoly on violence.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Which is solved by ... cartels? Private gun ownership? Terrorist/freedom-fighter groups?

Warlords have monopolies on violence and even that is through terror, not actual power.

The working class is just always so much larger than the ruling class (if it weren't, there wouldn't be an inequality problem to begin with).

It's just wrong to think that USA only supports righteous freedom fighters.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

Restrictive gun laws, but live in North America? Just hop on over to the Ugunted Guns of Agundica and get as many as you want!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The international community should probably do what the US did to set the drinking age to 21, but for guns.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Minimum_Drinking_Age_Act

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

How about voting? Maybe that age should be higher as well?

21 years old to be religious. That sound okay?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

How is that supposed to work? The international community doesn’t pay for US infrastructure.

The USA are a huge market for handguns and keep for example the European companies in business.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Mexico doesn’t really check vehicles coming into the country either. That’s something they could start doing. I know I’ve only been stopped one time out of maybe 20 but granted I’m not transporting a firearm.

Downvotes for the truth i guess. Obviously there’s way too many guns but if you don’t even check at the entrance then that’s definitely an area for improvement

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›