this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
717 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19634 readers
3017 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. accused Bernie Sanders of taking millions from Big Pharma during a heated exchange, but Sanders refuted the claim, stating his donations came from workers, not corporate PACs.

Kennedy repeatedly insisted Sanders was the top recipient of pharmaceutical money in 2020, but financial data shows no corporate PAC contributions to Sanders.

Meanwhile, Kennedy has profited from anti-vaccine activism, earning millions from lawsuits and speaking fees.

The debate ended without Kennedy answering whether he would guarantee health care for all as HHS secretary.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

It's so badly obvious, Trumps whole team is still using the "alternate truths" platform. Accuse the otherside of doing what you are actually guilty of doing. Sanders is pretty transparent about his elections and actions, the only thing he isn't transparent about... Using the same coat! The man bought 1 and was given 1 of the exact same winter coats... That's right! 2 coats!!!! 2 coats hanging in a house of LIES!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Why would Sanders argue with a freak?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 19 hours ago

Because if you don't stand up to them, you stand with them.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Could they take any other photo of him for the article? They are ridiculing him, making him look like an angry old monkey, completely in the line with what this Corpsefucker Jr wanted to achieve. With Musk suing Waltz for a sieg heil callout at the same time, I believe, it's a planned crusade against the last two guys who could have got everyone's respect if not support, and both attacks look nothing like boxing, but more like pissing down from the top of the ladder while having an idiotic laughter and cheering oneself for how it's top comedy. They may not feel threatened by these two old white dudes with a stellar rep, but they want to hammer everything that's left on the table and still moving.

And, well, the more infuriating thing than what these inbreds do is that they don't target Harris, because since the failed elections she is nowhere to be seen after being a VP and nearly a president, and that just shows how bad of the pick she was if even Bush Jr of all people had a media coverage, and she just didn't.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

I see this image and I see an energetic man fighting for human rights, despite the age.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What the fuck do you want Harris to do? She's not President, Donald Trump is President. A big reason for that is people constantly needing to blame Democrats for everything. You got it so bad you're right now blaming an unemployed Democrat for the bad things that are happening while the GOP is controlling all branches of government.

The bad things that are happening are because people didn't vote for Harris. If you didn't vote for Harris, you're a part of the reason why bad things are happening. She ran a good campaign, was obviously the better choice for President, but not enough people voted for her because they're stupid. You have the government the American people voted for, or allowed to happen by not voting.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 201 points 1 day ago (5 children)

“And by the way, Bernie, the problem of corruption is not just in the federal agencies. It’s in Congress too,” Kennedy said. “Almost all the members of this panel, including yourself, are accepting millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry and protecting their interests.”

“Oh, no, no, no, no,” Sanders said, raising his hand to quiet the applause that erupted from the gallery. “I ran for president like you. I got millions and millions of contributions. They did not come from the executives; not one nickel of PAC money from the pharmaceutical industry. They came from the workers.”

RFK just kept saying it over and over again like Sanders didn't address it. 1.5 million of the 200 million raised for his presidential campaign came from health care workers. And he still didn't answer the question, only for Sanders to be told he's battering the witness.

Fucking hate this time line.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

RFK just kept saying it over and over again like Sanders didn’t address it.

Sanders is used to this sort of treatment. Though not from Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Keep saying it as if it was never addressed because that's what works.

If you say something enough times it is reality to the majority of the voter base in the US.

If you ignore all refutes logic or facts and simply steam ahead with your word being the only right word then that will become reality

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yup, plenty of people will say that RFK won the argument, simply because he remained aggressive and seemed to be on the offensive. Lots of people don’t critically listen to the content; They just listen to the tone, and determine the winner based on that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

That's part of the fundamental problem is caring about who won instead of what is actually correct

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

Keep saying it as if it was never addressed because that’s what works.

Reminds me of this: https://youtu.be/PbsGJ2c2R4M?t=59

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't someone just make him follow in his father's footsteps already?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

music plays

"Oh my, who's that joining Royal Rumble...

IT'S SIRHAN SIRHAN JR WITH A STEEL CHAIR"

[–] [email protected] 320 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Questioning Sanders’ integrity would be the last thing I’d want to do; especially if I were as ill-advised as RFK.

[–] [email protected] 138 points 1 day ago (23 children)

We're talking about a guy who, I shit you not. picked up roadkill -- specifically a dead bear -- and kept it in his car all day. He was planning on eating it but got busy. Eventually, it ceased to be fresh enough even for his palate so he decided to dump it in central park. He staged it with an old bike he had in his car so that it looked like a bicyclist rode into it and killed it. This is the quality of decision making we're talking about here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

The video that he released where he’s telling the story to Rosanne Barr of all people, is absolutely unhinged.

https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1820132549798347109

(Sorry for twitter link… is there a way to post to mirror site for twitter?)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

...and kids, that's how you get worms in your brain. (undercooked wild meat)

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 152 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (22 children)

RFK believes that he is above reproach. He is the delusional you get when you are born into massive wealth and privilege and think that you personally hit a home run. Completely surrounded by yes men his entire life. Trumpesk even.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ill-advised? You fucking what? You think this will make a difference?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago

Don’t get angry at me. Im not your enemy. Focus that rage where it belongs: the rich.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

Nothing will ever make a difference if no one expects it to make a difference. I hate this defeatism

[–] [email protected] 145 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I feel sorry for Sanders calling out that buffoon.

[–] [email protected] 174 points 1 day ago (73 children)

I feel sorry that the Democratic party opted to cheat us out of President Sanders.

load more comments (73 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sanders is one person that I wouldn't question the integrity of. Malicious dopes, would, but I wouldn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›