this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
716 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19634 readers
3355 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. accused Bernie Sanders of taking millions from Big Pharma during a heated exchange, but Sanders refuted the claim, stating his donations came from workers, not corporate PACs.

Kennedy repeatedly insisted Sanders was the top recipient of pharmaceutical money in 2020, but financial data shows no corporate PAC contributions to Sanders.

Meanwhile, Kennedy has profited from anti-vaccine activism, earning millions from lawsuits and speaking fees.

The debate ended without Kennedy answering whether he would guarantee health care for all as HHS secretary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 320 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Questioning Sanders’ integrity would be the last thing I’d want to do; especially if I were as ill-advised as RFK.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ill-advised? You fucking what? You think this will make a difference?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

Don’t get angry at me. Im not your enemy. Focus that rage where it belongs: the rich.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Nothing will ever make a difference if no one expects it to make a difference. I hate this defeatism

[–] [email protected] 138 points 1 day ago (5 children)

We're talking about a guy who, I shit you not. picked up roadkill -- specifically a dead bear -- and kept it in his car all day. He was planning on eating it but got busy. Eventually, it ceased to be fresh enough even for his palate so he decided to dump it in central park. He staged it with an old bike he had in his car so that it looked like a bicyclist rode into it and killed it. This is the quality of decision making we're talking about here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

The video that he released where he’s telling the story to Rosanne Barr of all people, is absolutely unhinged.

https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1820132549798347109

(Sorry for twitter link… is there a way to post to mirror site for twitter?)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

...and kids, that's how you get worms in your brain. (undercooked wild meat)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

so that it looked like a bicyclist rode into it and killed it

That's how the Internet still helps my mental health sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

One thing I really do not understand. How can a bear be roadkill? What does your car look like after you hit a bear?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lots of bears where I am. If you hit them head on, your car is usually totaled.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is why bullbars are somewhat common in rural areas. More for deer than bears, though. And you're more likely to crack your radiator than have a total loss, unless you keep driving with a leaking radiator of course...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullbar

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I dunno, I tend to see that shit way more often on lifted pavement princess f-150's and dodge rams than on, say, your classic rural 1990's nissan shitbox truck, or your classic ford ranger. Though the lines do become blurred, when your private ranchers are naturally also multi-millionaires. In any case, bullbars are somewhat sensible maybe for encountering, say, a bull, or if you're a police vehicle with a specific application, but more generally they're horrible for ensuring pedestrian safety, ensuring crash safety when met with a stationary barrier like a bollard or a tree or a concrete barricade, or a storefront, and they're obviously much worse in a crash with any other car. There are bullbars which try to get around these issues with more thoughtful integration with the frame of the car or the choice of material, but the vast majority I've seen are just tube steel.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Huh? I said they're somewhat common in rural areas. Pavement princesses are also common in rural areas. But I also see bull bars on Jeeps, SUVs, etc. so I wouldn't automatically associate them with the pavement princess crowd.

You mention ranchers and police, but didn't mention anything about large wildlife which is what this thread is about. Not sure what pedestrian safety has to do with it, but it think it's obvious from looking at them that a plastic bumper would hurt less.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

My point is only that bull bars sort of, have a different cultural association and collective cost-benefit than, say, cowcatchers on rural freight rail, and my only point in pointing that out, is really just to sort of, educate people about a series of fun facts, or things they may not have previously considered very much. i.e. if you live in suburbia, or if you find yourself driving to walmart once or twice a week, you should maybe not have bull bars on your car. Sort of also plays into the idea of like, larger cars, or even lifted cars, being overly tall in their hood height, meaning they'll dump most pedestrians face flat onto the ground and potentially under the car, rather than tipping them onto the hood of the vehicle, and bull bars can serve to potentially exacerbate that problem. Which also ties into the jeeps and SUVs thing. I dunno.

Ranchers were sort of who I was thinking of when I was thinking of someone who would be extremely rural, and who on occasion will commute into a probably very small town with only one or two big box stores, gas stations, maybe a motel 6, and other highway-exit popups. There's not much out in the boonies outside of agriculture, and like, maybe forestry or things of that nature.

There's sort of, a weird kind of stereotyping around rurality on the internet, where it's all seen as being sort of, extreme poverty, or, people living entirely disconnected from society, maybe working occasionally for some soulless big corporate farm that has no local upper management, and so everything there is sort of, supposed to be put upon, but also be noble in poverty, and be authentic, agreeable, and agree with me in all the ways that matter, especially politically. That's the sort of like, idiot stereotype of rurality. That wealth gap is real, sure, you'll drive through and see a bunch of millionaire plots of land flanked by like, random trailers that haven't really been updated or maintained since the 70's, that part is true enough. But basically, the idea that small trucks are the true sign of the working class ranchhand, and the large truck is always, always, some sort of like, pavement princess owned by an IT worker in san-francisco, that's obviously false, and people don't think about it at all. Obviously things aren't as clear cut, plenty of people working what are otherwise blue collar jobs have big trucks, live in actual rurality, and have an at least somewhat justified reason for owning the kinds of vehicles they own.

I dunno, I'm just, making a lot of conversation, you know? I saw bull bars brought up and I decided to bring up more shit about them. Cultural context, pedestrian safety, shit like that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

That's fair. Sorry I was being confrontational, I've been a little stressed out lately.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One of the companies that makes bullbars is called Ranch Hand.

This is massively off topic, but the subject never comes up. I wonder if I could trouble you for independent confirmation that their logo looks like a Ferengi.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Heh yeah I can see the resemblance

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Depends on the kind of bear. A black bear cub like this would be like hitting a dog, I suspect. An adult would fuck your car up good.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Depending on the car as an 18 wheel semi will liquidate anything it runs into.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Black bears in general aren't very big bears. They weigh about 100 kilos on average and are about the height of a person if they are standing but only a meter tall on all fours. I've ran across them a few times while out hunting deer and it always surprises me how small they are.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Honestly out of the things he's said I don't even care about this. Other than the eating roadkill part this is the kind of shit me and my friends got up to when we were younger.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure it's just kids being kids. He was only 61 years old at the time.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

Eh, weird but still pretty harmless imo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just casually driving by myself on a tuesday oh look a bear carcass. Better put that in my vehicle for later. To eat.

3 days later... fuck thats right theres a rotting bear in my car. Better get rid of it in a funny way im going to be making health decisions for the entire country soon

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I doubt you were up to the kind of shit JFK was up to unless you spend your youth on a carcass pit feeding your pet hawk and had your own gang. Behind the Bastards had an episode on RFK Jr and it's wild.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yea honestly? it's funny as fuck, legendary prank. Oh no a dead bear in central park oh noooooo

Hear me out: what actually troubles me is his opinions about vaccines. Strange take, I know.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Yea, far more concerning things about him to focus on.

[–] [email protected] 152 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

RFK believes that he is above reproach. He is the delusional you get when you are born into massive wealth and privilege and think that you personally hit a home run. Completely surrounded by yes men his entire life. Trumpesk even.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, and in my personal experience, I’ve found people who feel they are never wrong to be the most uninformed and unintelligent of all people. It’s so sad that these people also are the ones that somehow rise to power and influence.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's all about confidence. If you think you are infallible you will have perfect confidence no matter how wrong you are.

Conman is a shortened version of confidence man.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

I encounter lots of people that are confidently incorrect.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We really need to stop thinking the Kennedy family are in any way special other than Joe who IRL is a nice guy who tries to stop people from freezing to death.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

We really need to stop thinking of anyone as special and treat everyone with dignity and respect (excluding Nazis).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yep one should never generalize anything that broad. Joe and maybe caroline. She at least sees the writing on the wall and has no desire to get involved with politics. Just living her own life

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I never met her. I have met Joe a few dozen times campaigning for candidates and gay marriage in MA decades ago.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I can't say I know a ton about her either. But I seem to remember in the early aughts there were some pushing for her to get involved in politics. And I know she's come out against Robert Jr etc. And that's at least two decent decisions. But Joe definitely sounds like a pretty stand-up guy.