this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
88 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15915 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ledditors griefing over internet "censorship" and muh freeze peach principles that were apparently violated when effective, direct measures were used to combat fascism.

I don’t think we should ever celebrate people being deplatformed...If the content is illegal pursue legal means to punish the posters...But let’s say they win, and they get the domain blocked everywhere. They’ll just launch a new domain, just like all the pirate streaming sites do.

Are you implying you shouldn't try to do anything because the fascists will (deterministically) win? Hence why the people trying to shut them down went straight to the ISPs because they know they can win the ISPs over on moral grounds?

[...] you have to decide if the internet is a human right or not. If it is, it must be for everyone, or it is for no one. As soon as we make exceptions to basic rights, those rights get eroded for everyone. Because people in power will bend the exceptions to political expediency.

Fascists don't deserve basic rights.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fascists don't deserve basic rights.

correct

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More and more people are saying this! But seriously, in the gulag you'll get human rights but certainly not a loaded machine gun like unrestricted internet access to stalk, bully, and harass people to self-harm.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but certainly not a loaded machine gun

oh, they'll get a loaded machine gun
just not the end of it they're expecting

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

Fascists deserve as many human rights as they believe others should have

So yes. None 😊

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago (5 children)

[…] you have to decide if the internet is a human right or not. If it is, it must be for everyone, or it is for no one.

It's a human right.

Fascists aren't human.

😘

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not getting harassed by internet fascists should be a human right too, but the only 'rights' they care about are the ones that expand their bourgeois consumerism.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Chuds when people are doxxed, stalked, and sent death threats

shrug-outta-hecks

Chuds when they can't reply "peepeepoopoo" to their president on the internet

rage-cry

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

it must be for everyone, or it is for no one

The nazis must be let into the restaurant, or else no one should ever be seated galaxy-brain

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can still... use the rest of the internet... after the site is taken down...?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Legality is a very stupid and bad metric for what sites and communities should be combated. Piracy is illegal, fascism is legal. Laws are threats from the dominant socioeconomic group and so on.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Also, who's version of legality? I very much doubt Mr "Let the law handle the Nazis" is going to be happy if Iran or Saudi Arabia tried to take down porn sites due to their local laws.

Of course, that's a rhetorical question. Whenever someone talks like this they always mean American/Western laws, which they assume should apply universally.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why do orgs like the EFF and ACLU value moral victory over material victory?

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago

Because moral victory is good for the bourgeois state, while material victory is not

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

They're libs

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalist ideology in general, Žižek maintains, consists precisely in the overvaluing of belief – in the sense of inner subjective attitude – at the expense of the beliefs we exhibit and externalize in our behavior. So long as we believe (in our hearts) that capitalism is bad, we are free to continue to participate in capitalist exchange.

  • Capitalist Realism chapter 2
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

I see that a lot with China Man Bad takes, they decry the evil of the CPC, pick one random Chinese corporation they swear off (Tencent is a popular one), and then act like they’ve taken a principled stand while continuing to buy mountains of plastic shit that’s made in China.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

Because moral victories don't cost as much to the ruling class. stonks-up

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

They are part of the non-profit industrial complex. They make money by appealing to hardship and selling gains, not by directly assaulting systems of oppression. If they did, they would be quickly outlawed, perhaps branded a terrorist organization. They also ensure their own power and relevance through integration with that oppressive system and its centers of power. The EFF makes most of its money from "charitable organizations", i.e. rich people's kids' orgs that function as cheap PR due to tax write-offs, i.e. mouthpieces of the bourgeoisie. The ACLU is a libertarian org in bed with all kinds of corporate goons, again via "charitable organizations". It's actually a pretty great example of the limits of reformism and the way that radical movements are coopted into snd subsumed by capital, as it began as something much cooler.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’ll just launch a new domain, just like all the pirate streaming sites do.

copyrighted material and documenting people's whereabouts and goings on are exactly the same thing actually

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

context don't real, everything is a frictionless, spherical concept in a vacuum

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and that's why I cyberstalk kids

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

Freedom of speech (and comparable rights) applies under the assumption that no concerns should go unheard to ensure that everyone's needs are considered when making decisions so the best outcome can be achieved for everyone.

Kiwifarms exists to hurt people. People use it to hurt others. It does not need defending.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Turns out the "natural rights" framework is liberal bullshit and legal rights, while extremely useful, must be embraced as a fallible human construction that, on some level of application, must be delineated arbitrarily.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Nonsense built upon stilts

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

The thing about Kiwifarms is that it acts a lot more like Reddit (as a whole) than your typical forum. People don't come to Kiwifarms because they want to be a part of the Kiwifarms community -- they come to Kiwifarms because they obsess about some individual or some other community that they want to dunk on or harass. Each thread therefore has to be viewed more akin to a subreddit with its own separate userbase than your typical forum thread.

The best example for this are their two competing Ukraine war threads, one pro-Russia, the other pro-Ukraine, each with roughly the same number of posts yet representing two completely different, irreconcilable worldviews.

This property is what I think makes Kiwifarms so extremely resilient. Even if they have to move to the darknet, where other sites would normally not survive, they still have the necessary draw to gain new users from mere name recognition alone.

Because when you're obsessed about something or someone, is the small hurdle of installing torbrowser and looking up an onion link really going to stop you?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

I don’t think we should ever celebrate people being deplatformed

Correct. We should debate them in the marketplace of ideas

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So Keffals didn't get kiwifarms shutdown after all, huh?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it was down for like a week at best

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Sucks, wish I went down permanently.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I respected her fight but in the end it just shows how pathetic the state of human rights is in the West. I would assume that in a normal society, those who run a website like kiwifarms would be arrested on the grounds of causing mental and physical harm to innocent human beings.

What Keffals could only do was pressure various corporations that lie in the junctions between kiwifarms servers and the user. Her movement would pressure the private DNS provider, the private VPS host and Cloudflare inc. to stop having kiwifarms as customers. I think Cloudflare dropped them but I am not sure what things are like now.

This is not an indictment of Keffals and her efforts but rather of the justice systems of the developed world. FBI will hunt you down to the innermost circles of hell if you are sharing pirated books (b-ok.cc) or are downloading academic papers like Swartz was but if you are running a fascist cesspool you are given a pass probably because they recruit or entrap from there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

The endless battle to banish the world's most notorious stalker site - Lemmy.world

Damn Lemmy, I didn't know you guys were into stalking. But... uhhh... use those powers for good, I guess?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

I hate KF and the userbase more than virtually anything else. Pig farm septic bog ass site.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Not sure why they're involved, but uncritical support to the Economic Freedom Fighters against the internet fascists rat-salute

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

as long as the US government wouldn't literally put someone in a cage for it, you are morally obligated to provide anyone who asks with the means to do whatever they want, with zero discretion allowed on your part. because it's speech.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›