this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse memes

603 readers
279 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/24394554

Text for readability:

So far, Americans using RedNote have said they don't care if China has access to their data. Viral videos on TikTok in recent days have shown Americans jokingly saying they will miss their personal "Chinese spy," while others say they are purposefully giving RedNote access to their data in a show of protest against the wishes of the U.S. government.

"This also highlights the fact that people are thirsty for platforms that aren't controlled by the same few oligarchs," Quintin said. "People will happily jump to another platform even if it presents new, unknown risks."

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Was just talking with a friend that downloaded a Mastodon app a while back when Twitter was bought by Elon, encountered the "Choose a server" bit, and bailed after choice paralysis. They're technical and have a doctorate in Computer Science so it's not like they couldn't figure it out, but there's something in the human psyche where most people don't want to make choices like that. They're on Bluesky now and think its great.

IMO sites like https://pixelfed.org/how-to-join and https://join-lemmy.org/ should just have a normal sign up flow, and load balance between all servers that opt in. Looks like that's going to happen for Pixelfed:

https://mastodon.social/@dansup/113830788279211715

It'll make some people unhappy, but that's just how you get "normies" onto the Fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

If there were a good invite system you could have just shared that including a pre-selected instance for your friend. That's way more effective than trying to explain federation to people not really that interested in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Lemmy has 42k monthly active users

Feel free if you have any questions"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Server choice affects content discoverability, I don't think omitting that helps in the long run.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're going to be fine with those two. Mentioning federation issues from the get go is the best to get them uninterested in Lemmy immediately

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This feels like kicking the can down the road just to trip on it later, but I respect your effort and dedication, so do what you think is best, I wish you luck.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

IMO sites like https://pixelfed.org/how-to-join and https://join-lemmy.org/ should just have a normal sign up flow, and load balance between all servers that opt in.

I think the Join Fediverse site should ask a few questions (what service do you want? Where are you? What are your interests?) and spit out a small handful of suggestions. Shouldn't be too difficult to program.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's what join-lemmy.org does, is it not?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It doesn't ask where you are, just the language. As it's for Lemmy only, it obviously doesn't ask what service you are looking for too.

Join the Fediverse needs something much more like that but with the extra options. As it stands you have to do way too much scrolling, reading and clicking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

... and when it asks what language, it doesn't differentiate between English and American Englishes, for example, and you have to scroll down quite a long way to get shown Feddit.uk.

Sometimes you just want to know everyone's on the same page when you talk about biscuits, pants and fannies.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

.> Mind shuts down when asked to make a choice for himself

.> Is in computer science

Checks out

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Decision fatigue. It's a well known concept and can even be used in marketing as a standard manipulation tactic. If you have a job that has you making strategic decisions all day though, then you'll get decision fatigue. Then the last thing you want to do is mull over a bunch of server details to make the right choice 🤷‍♀️

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

doctorate in Computer Science

Lmfao

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah sorry but no. Lemmy sucks and the fediverse is an overly complicated mess of in groups, our groups, federated and non federated communities and people will be racist to you and and you can also end up indoctrinated just as much by picking the wrong community starting point.

Wondering why people aren't here doesn't take a big mystery and despite all the people in here with blinders for all kinds of topics I'm not shocked that anyone looking in would be disgusted, compare this place to 4chan with user names and move on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

the children yearn for the vines

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

We're right here and we suck, mate. FOSS almost always sucks.

Besides, many Lemmy users have been very clear that they do not want the fediverse to have more reach. We don't try to appeal to TikTok users. We don't want to make space for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Regarding the fediverse at large...

I believe that this is a design issue. Instances are designed so that they function like categories. That categories then have subcategories.

The issue is that with user distribution, you can't then just assign users round robin distribute the load. This leads to what we now have which is very confusing to the end user.

Users was a centralized experience. The duplication of communities is a prime example of the bad design.

In the abstract, I would consider putting all instances in a pool. Each instance runs a different community, with servers also duplicating x number of communities for the sake of redundancy (instance goes offline, content still exists on another server). It's complicated, and has it's own issues/flaws, but I believe that from a high level view, it is a better design in general.

The current system is just a mess unfortunately.

Perhaps there could be a hybrid of these two approaches that would be superior.

My back of the napkin design prioritizes user experience and ease of use. That said, I can immediately think of a few downsides.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Each instance runs a different community, with servers also duplicating x number of communities for the sake of redundancy (instance goes offline, content still exists on another server). It’s complicated, and has it’s own issues/flaws, but I believe that from a high level view, it is a better design in general.

How are policies/moderation decisions discussed between the instances? That's why you have different versions of the same instance, because [email protected] and [email protected] are going to be quite different

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

No more instance based communities. Instead instances are assigned to groups of servers for redundancy and you end up with a more centralized experience.

Essentially you end up with a server cluster.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Right now the user's identity and the content they consume & interact with are too intertwined in many cases.

There are two aspects here:

  1. The user's home base, which is basically which server or app they log into.
  2. The communities they belong to, which can be on any server anywhere on the fediverse.

We have to get out of the mindset that the server you sign up on is your community, because with federation, you are not limited to the server you sign up on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

"This also highlights the fact that people are thirsty for platforms that aren't controlled by the same few oligarchs," Quintin said. "People will happily jump to another platform even if it presents new, unknown risks."

Once again...meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

“This also highlights the fact that people are thirsty for platforms that aren’t controlled by the same few oligarchs,”

So they move (and apparently willingly provide more access to their info than they already need to) to a platform that is controlled by a different few oligarchs, as a treat.. 🙄

Also, you say we're right here, but the number of people already here praising this shit* because they're either tankies simping for faux communists, or simply too indoctrinated to realise that you don't have to choose one, and can oppose both oppressive states (which use almost identical tactics), is pretty fucking gross.

*and before they descend on me with their bullshit and excuses and their throwing of marginalised people under the bus for the sake of maintaining their own black and white view of the world - yes Chinese and American people communicating and breaking down barriers is good. However the idea that this can honestly and freely be done on their oppressive state controlled media, any more than it can on ours, or that one is somehow less oppressive than the other, is a joke, and so are the people ignoring the fact that both states have equally terrible mass surveillance and control over our communications.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oligarch doesn't mean a rich person, it means a person who controls the country with their wealth. Even the richest people in china are still at the governments behest, not the other way around like in America.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Lmmfao, who do you think runs the Chinese government, the workers?

Anyway, thanks for providing an example of exactly the kind of bullshit and excuses I was referring to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

they execute billionaires from time to time. when's the last time a western country did that?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

most western countries are civilised enough to not allow capital punishment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Lol. Lmao even. They kill millions of Arabs and Asians just for fun

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I love how modern liberals sound exactly like they did 140 years ago when discussing foreign people

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes unlike the barbaric yellow hordes, their western betters have the civility to only perform executions in the streets, prior to arrest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Extrajudicial street executions happens in Baghdad and Boston, both are done by white supremacist thumbs exported from the USA

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Thesis:

Boston

Antithesis:

exported from the USA

Synthesis:

Boston is not in the USA

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

Lmmfao, who do you think runs the Chinese government, the workers?

yes

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe people want a platform that’s more than just a constant Linux and capitalism-bad circlejerk sprinkled with some basic news and askreddit-type threads.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

We have Star Trek too

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"people are thirsty for platforms that aren't controlled by the same few oligarchs" so they're willingly submitting to and supporting CCP tyrannical oppression because they personally have never felt it's raw evil, "Fuck the Chinese" I guess, huh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, fuck the Chinese GOVERNMENT. You don't have to be bigoted towards the people of a country to disapprove of what their authoritarian government does.

Personally, I have nothing against the people of China, Iran, or the US (to name a few obvious examples of peoples under the boot of an unrepresentative government), but that doesn't mean that I approve the oppression and other abuses their governments keep committing towards their own people and others.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

congratulations, everyone else understood what i was saying but you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Nope. If you mean the Chinese GOVERNMENT, say that. "The Chinese" means Chinese people.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

Lol. I'm not actually surprised at all that the country that just elected Junior Hitler again is literally begging to be fucked by the CCP. You REALLY cannot fix stupid and stupid is now the vast majority.