this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
109 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2267 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

House Speaker Mike Johnson angered both his Republican caucus and Donald Trump by negotiating a bipartisan budget deal with Democrats to avoid a government shutdown.

Trump, feeling “blindsided” and “furious,” reportedly encouraged Elon Musk to attack House leadership on X, leading to over 100 posts that derailed the deal temporarily.

While the budget ultimately passed with Democratic support, far-right Republicans were left fuming.

The incident highlights tensions within GOP leadership and Trump’s use of Musk to wield influence over congressional negotiations.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

His hand looks so small in that picture.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

I bet Elons hands are bigger than Trumps hands.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

And with the foreshortening it should seem overly large. Trump's baby hands crack me up

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 hours ago

aww they're writing stories now to try to refute the "President Musk" narrative. Too bad the facts on the ground don't match the "Trump told Musk to attack" malarkey. It's absolutely clear that Musk is in charge and Trump just followed along with "yeah what he said!"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 hours ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

Does trump smear musks shit on his face?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 hours ago

I only see 2 clowns.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 hour ago

One of them has more facepaint than the other, but I'm still not sure which is which.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Bonus points if you guess which is which.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 6 hours ago (8 children)

Like I don’t know how Musk has any sway in Congress? He’s a an unelected civilian. Why wouldn’t you just ignore his yapping? What is he going to do? What power could he truly possibly have besides having a Tesla run you over? Like I’d love to be an elected official and deal with that chode. I’m the most stubborn man in the world.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

In one of Bernie Sander's response video in regards to the shutdown, he said that Musk threatened to withdraw support from Republicans who would vote for the proposed budget.

Money is power in politics, and the politicians are greedy for more of it. The billionaire class is the one paying for the politicians' salary. Ours is only a drop in the ocean for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Makes sense. Leave it to Bernie to give us the info.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

The rich just get influence. It comes with the money.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 hours ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

What if the spectre of an army of Elon-backed challengers is what it takes to finally motivate campaign finance reform?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I love your optimism and wish I shared in it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

It's nice to think accelerationism will work this time.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 hours ago

"Money is Speech, unless it's funding my opponent" seems very appropriate for today's Republican party.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Not sure why this is still a hard concept to grab, elections are always bought

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

The bottom line as always: “Money, dear boy.”

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 hours ago

That's his power and looks like that's how he can make Congress do what he wants including confirming his cabinet.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 hours ago

Elon publicly said if you don't do what he says, he will spend millions to make sure you lose the next election.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

He has a couple million fascist followers who reread The Turner Diaries every other week and can't cum unless they're fantasizing about The Day Of The Rope so that's one thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

That is brilliant

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

He controls a propaganda machine that's popular with an increasingly wide array of their constituents, and he's personally popular with those same people. The only real thing an elected representative cares about is not being elected again, and musk is a threat of that to some elected representatives.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

M O N E Y : )

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Money talks.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Trump isn’t president yet. But still it’s a good sign that he can’t just use bully tactics to get what he wants.

He has no negotiation skills. No real political capital. And he’s despised by most of the leaders who support him only transactionally. His only trick will be lies and threats and Elon’s propaganda site. So maybe he won’t be able to do as much damage as we feared.

But what do I know. I thought he’d be in jail by now.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

But what do I know. I thought he’d be in jail by now.

That's what you get for having faith in what is an obviously broken system. I'm in my forties and it's been broken since before I was born. Honestly, I get sick of people circlejerking the "founding fathers" because their constitution sucks shit. It was a broken system from the get-go, built to represent just rich land-owning white men. Literally this country was founded on "I'm rich and I hate being taxed, that's for the poors." Did anyone with a brain ever expect it to turn out any other way?

I was in court recently and a lady was crying her eyes out, saying calling the cops was a mistake, because her partner was having a mental breakdown, and now her partner has charges, is in jail, and she is about to be evicted from her home because her partner was paying the bills.

The prosecuting attorney leaps to the microphone to make a statement "I want to make clear that calling the cops is never a mistake." He literally is flat out ignoring what actually happened and ignoring this woman's feelings and just saying to her face "if you called them, no matter how bad it went, it wasn't a mistake." That's the reality, is a lot of the people in this fucked up broken fucking system are perfectly fine with how it works and think it's great that it all works this way. They are fine with ruining people's lives as long as those people are powerless to fight it.

Laws are only for the poors. What fucking fantasy world have you been living in?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

The ol’ legal system vs the justice system. We only got one that’s working as intended.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago

He's a fucking incompetent loser and he's way more incoherent now than he was 8 years ago. He's still very dangerous but there is a chance he just won't be able to get things done.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 hours ago

It's Shakespearian. The protagonist now has everything they said they wanted, and will proceed to ruin everything for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 hours ago

Whiner in chief. What a fucking joke of a person he is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I love seeing musk used as the wedge (and cudgel) that’s breaking apart the Republican Party.