274
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Elon Musk is unlikely to receive the highest-level government security clearance due to concerns over drug use, foreign contacts, and potential risks of disclosing classified information, according to Wall Street Journal reports.

Musk, who holds “top-secret” clearance, has faced scrutiny for past drug use, including marijuana and alleged ketamine use, and reported contacts with Vladimir Putin since 2022.

SpaceX lawyers advised against seeking higher clearance, fearing denial and revocation of existing clearances.

While Musk may bypass traditional clearance under Trump’s incoming administration, he currently lacks access to SpaceX's most classified projects.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] hark@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago

I hope he pisses off trump enough to get destroyed.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hopefully they destroy each other while they’re at it

[-] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago

If enough people start talking about President Musk and his sidekick Trump...

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[-] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

This has to spread enough for orange turd to watch !

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's inevitable.
They're both extreme narcissists and only Trump has any legitimate power out of the two. Eventually musk will try too hard to control him and Trump will use everything in his power to destroy him which, thanks to the Supreme Court, is now unlimited.
So I'd expect to see the IRS weaponized against Musk sometime in the next 12 months at the absolute latest.

[-] boaratio@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

I had a friend, at my first job out of college, have his "sensitive" security clearance denied after a full year of background checks because during his polygraph he admitted to trying cocaine when he was in college. That's the lowest level of security clearance, and yet musk somehow has a clearance near the top.

[-] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 28 points 1 year ago

I bet the secret ingredient is money.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And the content of their address book.

[-] vikingr@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

This happened to me almost 20 years ago. Answered truthfully about smoking weed. Instant denial.

[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago

Yep. The spooks are prudes about weed. No wonder we have a lack of talent in classified work.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Seems to me they're just weeding out the folks who can't lie. Can't have any honest ppl in government /s

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Did your friend have hundreds of billions of dollars?

How long ago was it? When I did mine, there was an established secondary process if you answered about drugs to explain the circumstances around your usage.

[-] boaratio@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

2005, long before any states had legalized weed or any other recreational drugs.

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 59 points 1 year ago

Musk, who holds “top-secret” clearance, has faced scrutiny for past drug use, including marijuana and alleged ketamine use, and reported contacts with Vladimir Putin since 2022.

That escalated quickly.

[-] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Marijuanas is a gateway drug. I smoked 3 marijuanas and 5 weeks later came out of my k hole and I was in the middle of multi-billion dollar business deal with Kim Jong Un. Never smoking marijuanas again.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 19 points 1 year ago

That's the logical progression from smoking a marijuana, it's not worth doing it.

[-] tiptaptoe@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago

That's correct, been smoking for a few years now and didn't meed Putin until last month.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Remember the classical progression: Marijuana, then ketamine, then Putin.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I would bet his ketamine use predated the time he famously smoked weed on Rogan's show.

And he does not strike me as a regular consumer of cannabis.

[-] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Remember kids, Putin: not even once.

[-] Graphy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I quickly went from thinking “yeah i can’t blame him those sound like the usual reasons why no one wants to work for the feds” to “oh”

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One of those is not like the others

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

It's a good thing Trump has a history of rigorously protecting classified documents, right guys?

[-] HootinNHollerin@slrpnk.net 29 points 1 year ago

He shouldn’t have any clearance

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Is it unlikely or will he not get it?

Anyway, whatever level of security clearance he gets, he'll invariably blab out some secret on Twitter while making one of his "hilarious" jokes during a ketamine binge.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If I am not mistaken, the President has a lot of authority over security clearances. So for the next 4 years, just like with many other things, it will depend on how a certain Orange feels that day.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Trump already gave military secrets out on twitter during his last presidency

It’s not as low of a bar as you think

[-] tiptaptoe@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 year ago

Interesting that he doesnt have access to his own company's project

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Not that he should, but I would bet that's less unusual than you would think. I imagine a lot of defence contractor CEOs are not given the clearance to access certain pieces of information that those working on the project have because some things need to be kept need-to-know.

[-] Geobloke@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I'm sure he'll just catch up on it on the bathroom

this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
274 points (97.9% liked)

News

36375 readers
2129 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS