DreamlandLividity

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Eh, while cash bail should be ended, it's disingenuous to claim there is no reasoning for it's existence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Well, DC was very explicitly created so that the capital would not be in any state, so while they should get senators and representatives, they should not become a state.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I mean sure, that is how some (mostly strategy and tactical) games do it, but for an FPS, figuring out where the buffer should be would be a programmers nightmare. I guess you would have to try to calculate all possible lines of sights a player could have within some buffer time (100-1000ms) and then all players that could in theory enter them... Add physics and it is practically impossible.

Also, corner hack is useful enough and it does not address aimbot. IMO the answer is some combination of human moderation and ability to play with "friends" instead of randos. E.g. you could ask people to like or dislike a player at the end of a match and try to pair players that liked each other in the past.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That does not detect things like wall hack and aim-bots that don't modify the game state directly.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In XMPP, e2e encryption (just like everything else) is an optional extension. So in practice half the clients don't support e2ee, half support different version of e2ee (can't talk to each other) and pretty much all e2ee are likely full of holes since there are too many implementations to review.

In Matrix, e2ee is in a library that all clients can use, so while it is not Signal, it provides decent security.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I realized my mistake almost immediately and deleted the comment but apparently not fast enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Approval voting absolutely sucks. Not for any mathematical reason, it may very well give us the best results mathematically, but for psychological reasons. If you give approval to both the safe (popular) candidate and your preferred one, then you won't feel you have expressed your preference once the popular candidate wins. If you only approve your preferred candidate and an opposing (very undesirable) candidate wins, you again regret not voting tactically. In either case, you justifiably have no confidence in the results.

Also, as a candidate, how do you get people to not mark other candidates in addition to you? The answer is you don't run on your own positions but attacking opponents. Not very healthy for democracy.

I need to think more on STAR.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you weren't so broke, you would know there is also Switzerland. ;)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

You do realize some countries in Europe have federal governments (Germany for example), right? And then these completely independent countries are part of the EU which have EU elections. So you have federation within federation. Also, the EU has higher population than the USA. We don't even all speak the same language. We are allowed to move between EU countries whenever we like and have residence where we please.

I think its not Europeans that don't understand.

update: In case it is not clear, being registered automatically is the same as not having to register, which is what the post is about. Idk what that update word salad is supposed to be or why it is an update instead of a reply.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"But what about rich white kids"

Yeah, a great argument...

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

I would be very unhappy if I saw this spacecraft, that still has probably more than 95% chance of bringing me home safely if something happened, leave with no alternative in sight.

-31
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I see this way too often here on Lemmy, so I want to post this. Starting a commune is legal in most countries. If you believe in communism, you can found a commune and show us all how great it is.

You lack money? Well, that is literally what stock markets and venture capitalists (capitalism) are created to solve. If you are ready for an IPO, you can sell shares to raise funds. If you are not, you can get Venture Capital in exchange for shares until you are ready for an IPO.

Getting rid of capitalism means you need to find a different way to obtain funding for new ventures. And if your system relies on government charity (some government board handing you money) or taking resources violently, than your system sucks.

Edit: I don't mean that this is a replacement for full communist system. I mean this as a way to get some of the advantages while showing sceptics (like me) it can work and is better. A first step.

view more: next ›