The CEO sold all of his stocks shortly before being shot. The company was also being investigated for antitrust by the DoJ.
I'll be so disappointed if this was some intra-corporate bullshit.
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
121 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13604 readers
768 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
I will be disappointed but also 
for the new age of cyberpunk corpo assassinations we're entering.
I don't really believe this was actually a corpo assassin. Medical Insurance is too much of a cushy no-competition, no-consequences industry for anyone to have hitman connections. DoD contractors on the other hand...
I agree, I don't think so either. The only person with real motive might be his wife. But the most likely is someone with a grudge.
The CEO sold all of his stocks shortly before being shot
seriously? where'd you see this
EDIT: nevermind
Exactly the article I read.
Yeah i wouldn't be surprised if it was a paid hit job
Word on the street is United and Caremark will both be broken up soon
Do not short Caremark and you didn't hear this from me 
If I short a corporation's stock and they get broken up via antitrust before I'm forced to buy the stocks back what happens?
Sorry I have no idea, I don’t trade myself
Shit, the shareholders might want to think about making this a regular thing.
some kind of fucked up bizarro version of the Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas where every corporation's prosperity is ensured by the regular sacrifice of its CEOs
The line demands it! 
If this keeps happening like this, then there might be lobbyists trying to legalize CEO assassination.
its a company that profiteers off of human suffering so i think killing the ceo to make more money just makes sense
and they say capitalism doesn't innovate anymore
do you suppose the hitman was paid in crypto?
He actually acquired a few ape NFTs
unpaid intern
Even in death, he brings value to the company #grind
goodness, no, that sounds like it could constitute insider trading, and that would be illegal!
I don't think there's legal precedence to suggest that's insider trading.
CEOs are so important that even the markets believe the company will do better without one...
slides gun across table This is not financial advice