top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 118 points 2 years ago

"We're a tech company now!" logo

  • source
  • [–] 101 points 2 years ago (23 children)
  • [–] 55 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Better:

    • Revolut (though a fintech company named after a revolution lacking the charge at the end is still moronic in several ways)
    • airbnb (from awful to meh)
    • Spotify (same)

    Worse:

    • Pinterest (original fit the platform and what it is/was pretty much perfectly. Current is meh)
    • eBay (both are bad IMO, but at least the original was bad in a playful and eye-catching way. The new one is just more meh
    • Burberry (the stag was notable and signalled a history of old-fashioned quality that's suitably rugged. The new one is meh AND insecure about people knowing which London they're from)
    • Rimova (yet another fashion brand apparently afraid of being noticed
    • DF (from one of the best and most fashion-appropriate logos to an absolute eyesore and kerning nightmare that invites vandalism)
    • Jaguar (From absolutely iconic and great in every way to even uglier than the new DF one. I hope whomever came up with that got both fired and beaten and I'm a pacifist.)

    The rest just go from meh to slightly different meh 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 75 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I fucking hate this minimalist design trend more than it is probably reasonable to hate an aesthetic. It's got the personality of unfinished drywall.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 73 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Top looks like it belongs on a nice sports car.

    Bottom looks like you can find it on a new Multipla.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    That font is awful. The G looks completely unrelated to any of the other letters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 59 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I would have failed every design class I took in college if I submitted that. Why such wide kerning? Why lower case but upper G? Why so round? Why so completely unreadable at a distance because of micro serifs? There isn't one good design element in this.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    It doesn't say "car" at all either; no elegance or prestige. The old logo was sexy. New one looks like a logo for bottled water or something.

    Edit: it's like going from James Bond to Austin Powers Inspector Gadget

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think they want people to focus on the "agua" and the j and r are just little accents on it like its word art rather than a logo. Like, I literally picture the marketing weirdos at the meeting going off like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    The "a" is the worst part for me. You can't see those little stubbs at a distance. So it reads JoGuor at a distance. They didn't just fail to create a good logo, they failed to preserve the name. One bit of advice I always give is "imagine this logo on the back of a golf card or a Pride brochure. If the logo isn't crisp and readable in black and white in a 1/2 inch square then it sucks." This design fails that test. Not just because of the messed up "a" but the wide spacing makes those unreadable "a"s even smaller than if the letters weren't so widely spaced.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 54 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    >New logo is soulless slop

    Every single company

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 37 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    Somewhere in Jaguar HQ, a marketing firm convinced the CxO suite that the most pressing problem facing the company was that the logo was wrong. So, in the interests of the shareholders they write off the goodwill value of the existing brand and dump millions of euro into this.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    GUys I'm from 2040 2035, here's Microsoft's logo

    MS corporate comms army did a sik job getting across those inscrutable monolith vibes, I bet when it launched they all clapped (even though clapping is in performance reviews)

    BONUS: heres Amazon, Faceberg and Nvideo too (yay diversity)

    spoiler

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    It takes a heroic amount of cocaine to make something so devoid of taste and see it through.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Wow, they really took their logo from sexy, fast and expensive looking, to looking like an over priced soft drink?

    That's impressive, haha.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago*
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    /uj Technically this is their new logo:

    J a G U a r is just their new typeface (I think that’s the name?); and apparently/allegedly is to make the pronunciation closer to UK English, rather than American.

    Either way, though - it’s still..

    /j

    ..pReTtY fArKiN’ sToOoPiD.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I love how the new logo could be literally done in less than a minute on fucking microsoft office. They didn't even bother with a cool looking font, just generic curvy shit

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    They went from luxury car company to mediocre smartphone brand

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    The font is ugly.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    I dont understand modern logos principles. How tf is that recognizable. Also animals are fun. Stop getting rid of animals from icons.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    You were supposed to remove the text...

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (5 children)
    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago*

    Their logo doesn't have a jaguar and their car commercial doesn't have any cars. Fuck it, whatever

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Soon there will be no color, no originality.

    Just a single font to use everything will be homogeneous and consolidated. Minimal, inoffensive and focused grouped to appeal to everyone and also no one.

    Movies, music, games, brands.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    A design consultant probably sent Jaguar a six-figure bill for this new logo, you know.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    That looks like marketing, let their six-year-old design the logo. Half the letters or lowercase and half are uppercase.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago*

    Changing things for sake of changing things. Like Microsoft with every moronic "update".

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›