this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
420 points (90.7% liked)

Greentext

4410 readers
1797 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 44 minutes ago

Using tinder like a ranked FPS is surely something

[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Remeber when greentext was something interesting or toughtfull? Instead of fariytales for incels?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago

Honestly, no. It was exactly this bad in the early '00s

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 hours ago

Not in the last 15 years.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

~~ELO is a term used in ranked competitive video games. Part of this author's sense of humor is that tinder is a ranked game~~

edit: see correction below

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Elo (and not ELO, it's a person's name) originally comes from chess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

ooooh shiny

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The concept of "ranked competitive" systems, in general, evolved over time, but if we're talking about ranked competitive structures in games or sports, we can trace it back to a few key milestones in history:

Ancient and Medieval Competitions: Even in ancient civilizations, competitive games, including some forms of organized sports or games like wrestling, were often ranked in some way, though these rankings were informal.

Modern Sports Rankings: The formal idea of ranking athletes based on performance in a competitive environment began to take shape in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, especially with the establishment of professional leagues. For example:

Tennis established its first official ranking system in the 1910s. Golf created a ranking system (the "Official World Golf Ranking") in 1986.

All of this was way before chess was invented, around 2014 or so.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Can women message people on Tinder they haven't matched with?

And if this was effective wouldn't it lower all women's Elo scores? Unless he only ignored one group and catfished everybody else. Sounds like a lot of work.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

No, only tinder premium can do so IIRC.

Bumble? From memory women can only message first, men must wait to be messaged before they can.

It's been a while since I used those platforms so my information could be incorrect.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

Bumble is moving away from having women message first as apparently it was too much of a burden for the women on that app (According to https://www.npr.org/2024/05/06/1249296671/bumble-dating-apps-women-opening-moves )

Understandable as I find having to generate an opener hard too. Kinda a shame though as the point was to give them a place to have some more control with the interactions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

As a man who would often get matches but rarely get so much as a "hi" to allow the conversation to start (i'd say only 1/8 of the matches would say anything in the 24h), I really wonder why. A number of women apparently never read that they were supposed to send a message first when using bumble (I did hear that more than once on the app), but others? Why?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Well, although I'm not so sure about bumble, I know women on tinder have a volume problem, a few friends have shown me the number of matches and current conversations and wow, it's actually absurd. I could not maintain that many interactions either. So perhaps if not an issue with formulating an opener there's just too many matches to reasonably get through them?

That makes me actually wonder if a match limit would be a worthwhile feature on some of these. Just a stray shower thought

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Tinder is a wholly different problem because of that. If memory serves, it's roughly 80/20 distribution of male/female profiles, so women are absolutely bombarded with conversations, as pretty much every man will want to try and get attention without knowing how deep his last message is buried among all others.

Bumble had less people in my area last I used it (late 2023), but I can imagine that men vastly outnumbered women even there, but again, since they had to start a conversation first, I suspect it'd be slightly more manageable than tinder. The idea of limiting matches sounds useful and perhaps good for the end user, ie: you won't show up on searches and you can't swipe as long as you have 10 or more matches, you have to actually unmatch to "get back". Don't expect any app to ever implement anything similar without figuring a way to make it a very shitty experience.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

I can see how it'd be less money for the app and better for the User, so definitely not gonna happen lmao. IIRC choice fatigue grows wildly with anything beyond a few options so, yeah, being bombarded like that suuuuucks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

Ppl in this thread so pathetic they can't say "hello"??

Epic

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn't that the whole point of bumble?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, pretty much haha, otherwise its just tinder. I used it briefly a while back and usually the first message would be "." so that I could start the actual conversation. So I supposed it's never been all that different to begin with

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the old Bumble model was better (in my opinion as a man). It creates incentive to have an interesting profile with stuff people can comment on. The newer "opening move" thing incentivizes generic responses. Bumble (in my experience) still has women message first far more often than Tinder though. You may just have to wait and not message immediately.

Creating an opening message is only really difficult if someone has a generic boring profile, so if it's an issue for anyone maybe that's why.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

I agree it was a better model. I've never found it easy to begin a conversation even with someone who has a good profile. I just struggle with the formulation of an opener. Way easier in person IMO, though a good profile makes a conversation continuation much easier.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think this is an unrealized thought experiment by op. I don't believe the Chad he imagines has any relation to the man most woman are looking for.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Op creates profile that makes him look rich and stupid.

Gets targeted by bots using ai generated images of mildly attractive women.

Thinks he’s actually attracting human beings.

Anon still has never willingly gotten the attention of a human woman besides his mother

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And I'm telling ya his momma is a nice lady.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

A classy lady, even

[–] [email protected] 104 points 1 day ago (23 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

'ello mate!

[–] [email protected] 168 points 1 day ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

It's not often I actually laugh when reading a comment. This was one of those times

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›