Lobsters go the other way though...
this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
377 points (98.0% liked)
Science Memes
10923 readers
2136 users here now
Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
- Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
- Keep it rooted (on topic).
- No spam.
- Infographics welcome, get schooled.
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
Research Committee
Other Mander Communities
Science and Research
Biology and Life Sciences
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- !reptiles and [email protected]
Physical Sciences
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Humanities and Social Sciences
Practical and Applied Sciences
- !exercise-and [email protected]
- [email protected]
- !self [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Memes
Miscellaneous
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Hey now - I ain't judging nobody.
There’s a Jordan Peterson joke in here somewhere
Well... duh? A fairer comparison would be the cow vs jeep. A sea creature vs something designed for land isn't that great of a comparison because water is thick enough that you're going to need some kind of aerodynamic (fluodynamic?) adaptation to survive. Air is thin enough that evolution can sacrifice some aerodynamics for other traits.
So is a cow more aerodynamic than a Jeep? Edit: Nevermind, it got kind of answered in another thread.
Even though you already got your answer, yes. Yes they are lmao. All I was trying to say, however, was that it's not exactly fair to compare "creatures" that exist in two different mediums.
At the speed cars move at, air behaves much like water. They're both fluids. The faster you move the more resistance it has, but also the more dense the fluid is the more resistance it has. Moving quickly through the air is similar to moving slowly through water.
I think it would be hydrodynamic and screw evolution I want my beef to be as aerodynamic as an F1.
Or a cow.
Man. That looks like one happy cow enjoying that breeze. So serene. Very jealous.
Interestingly, Jeep Wranglers are like the stereotypical hairdresser's car in Europe so this kinda makes sense
Wait til you see a spherical cow.
Wait till YOU see the biblically accurate cow.
How do you have access to a picture of me??
Thats because its...
HYDRODYNAMICALLY DESIGNED
I'm gonna need to put oversized tires, a jack, and a custom air intake on it for all my trips to Walmart.
On the lobster?
This guy gets it
have you ever submerged a jeep? i have. doesn't go very fast.
Then why do they have those mufflers that stick above the car?
Cyclist hate this not because of the danger it pose, but because it's not aero.
A Jeep is also less aerodynamic than a brick. Having a Jeep as a daily driver fucking sucks for gas mileage.
Wouldn't a lobster technically be waterodynamic? Or eauodynamic? What's Latin for water...?
eauodynamic is so fun to pronounce.
Hydrodynamic
Ugh, of course! Thank you! So dumb of me. Hydrohomies and all. Appreciate it.
That looks like a TJ generation. I’ve also seen these with the JK (usually compared with a cow). I’d be curious to see the JL/JT, though, because they did a very clever job of rounding it off while making it look like it’s still flat.