top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 101 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (28 children)

The landlord of a pub called The Pig And Whistle asked a sign writer to make a new sign. When he saw it he thought that the words were too close together, so he said to the sign writer “I want more space between Pig and And and And and Whistle”.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • load more comments (25 replies)
    [–] 90 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Live footage of me reviewing a report that has a repeated word series like this:

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 69 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    You can create a sentence with an infinite number of "police"

    Who polices the Police?

    Police Police police Police.

    Who polices the Police Police?

    Police Police Police police Police Police.

    And so on...

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 63 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    James, while John had had "had", had had "had had;" "had had" had had a greater effect on the teacher.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago*
    [–] 31 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    In German the following is a completely valid sentence:

    Wenn hinter Fliegen Fliegen fliegen, fliegen Fliegen Fliegen nach.

    Which translates to when flies fly behind flies, then flies follow flies. The same works for seals:

    Wenn hinter Robben Robben Robben, robben Robben Robben nach.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Some Hungarian prefixes can be piled on without limit, while still creating meaning.

    The word "úszni" means "to swim".

    Úsztatni - to make someone or someone swim
    Úsztattatni - to make someone make someone swim
    Úsztattattattattattattattattattni - to make someone make someone make someone ... make someone swim

    Can be done with any verb, and maybe some other suffixes as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    “That that” can and probably should be replaced with “that which” in almost every instance it is used.

    Edit: or “when that”

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It annoys me so much when I feel I need to write a sentence like that that I go to great lengths to restructure sentences to avoid it.

    ...fuck

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    "That that" spoken are two different sounding words so it makes sense. When it goes from verbal to written and I see it, I will almost always try to rephrase things to avoid that combo. It just jumps out as totally wrong.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I always read "read" as "read" but now everything's different.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sometimes we have a do do problem, too. I do do that, anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    I don't get it after the 2nd had, any chance someone else understands?

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    It needs a comma.

    All the good faith I had had, had had no effect.

    Essentially "all the food faith I previously had, didn't have any effect".

    Good God English is an awful language.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    English has its flaws, but I don't agree that that is one of them.

  • source
  • [+] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    dass das das das dass da ersetzen kann ist falsch

    translation: that "das" can replace "dass" there is wrong.

    same shit different barbarians

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Many of the at least 400 words that are technically both nouns and verbs depending on usage can form sentences of just repeating the word.

    Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

    Echoes echoes echoes Echoes' echoes.

    Mrs Missus misses misses' Missus.

    Fly flies fly.

    Tests "tests" tests tests Tests' test.

    Reasons reason reasons.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    What exactly is it that you do do?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You don't need the extra do in the do-do scenarios.

    "You do do that though" "You do that though"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    • Had had had had
    • OH MY GOD, HE HAS A STROKE!
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Maybe I'm just grouchy today but how in the world does a word coming up twice in a row translate to a language being flawed? That seems like calling spelling "flawed" because letters come up twice in a row in a word.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    About the sign "Alpha and Bravo", the spaces between Alpha and and and and and Bravo are too large.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›