At this point I'm going to Ladbrokes and betting against everything Kotaku promotes. They are like Jim Cramer of the gaming industry.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 146 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [+] 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 120 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    The most frustrating thing about this article is that it completely ignores that good movies targeted at kids still have to be good. Personal complaints aside, the new Mario movie was reasonably good for adults and great for kids. Pixar keeps churning out things that are fantastic on many levels. Bluey is an amazing show that can resonate with kids and parents. I don’t for a minute buy the elitist bullshit of “well you’re not a kid so you can’t comment.” Muppet Treasure Island holds the fuck up as an adult so this writer can fuck right off.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 58 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I've been playing Minecraft off and on since the Beta. I usually play the "All the mods" packs when they launch.

    I do not understand how people get so emotionally invested in an IP.

    If it isn't a good movie who cares? Just spend your time doing something else.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 2 years ago (22 children)

    Can't speak for everyone, but the reason that I care when one of my favorite IPs has a terrible movie, is because the terrible movie ensures that a good one will never be made.

    They did a great job with Fallout, and now they are making a second season.

    Then there's Borderlands.

    I still haven't seen it, but I already know that the Borderlands movie I would have loved will never exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • load more comments (21 replies)
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    Just reiterating what others have said but... if you have an IP you like and want more of it in the future (regardless of medium!) then its success in any other medium will likely impact whether or not you get more.

    Unfortunately, we live in a world where:

    • Money matters more to most IP holders than the IP itself

    • New IP is seen as risky

    • Those in charge don't have to take responsibility for their failures

    If there is a commercial failure of an IP, there is a good chance that its failure will be seen as the IP generally failing or falling out of poluarity instead of the failure to best utilize the IP that likely occurred. As a result, priorities will often shift away from the IP to something else in all mediums (ex. ASOIAF/GOT). Unless the IP is absolutely gangbusters in all other mediums, it will suffer. Similarly, success will likely lead to more utilization of the IP in any medium.

    It's unlikely that the IP owner will sell or license the IP in the near future because at one point it was popular and new IP is hard to make. It would be better to hoard IP and maybe try again in a decade when they need a trick up their sleeve. Plus, another failure might damage the IP even more.

    Admittedly, I'm not attached to any brands or IP in particular and so I'm not invested really. I just makes me a little sad when some IP I thought well of has this happen... or when the person who benefits from the IP turns out to be a person I'd rather not give money to. Occasionally I'll ponder what might have been if things had gone differently and feel a little bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    If there is a commercial failure of an IP, there is a good chance that its failure will be seen as the IP generally failing or falling out of poluarity instead of the failure to best utilize the IP that likely occurred.

    For example, when EA released Tiberian Twilight and it was absolutely awful and didn't sell, they said that people just didn't want RTS games anymore and shelved the entire C&C franchise. That was fourteen years ago and we haven't had a new C&C since then that wasn't mobile shovelware.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 45 points 2 years ago (4 children)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 39 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I mean, if you're going to make a movie based on a video game, shouldn't you aim it at The demographics that most commonly played that video game?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You mean 5-12 year olds? Cause that’s what they did

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    if it isn't meant for me, that's totally fine.

    That also means it's not my fault when the thing that isn't meant for me doesn't get a audience, right? Right?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Why didn't they just make it a fucking animated movie?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 37 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    By this logic: "The Borderlands movie isn't meant for you."

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Apparently it wasn't. I don't remember where I saw it, I think maybe a Kyle Bosman video, but Gearbox/Randy Pitchford basically said they made the movie to pull in people who hadn't played the games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It seemed like it would be a cheesey movie with some dry humor and I was okay with it up until the girl character called Jack Black "a massive toolbag." Thats not what I expect from a movie oriented to children, and that made me immediately drop any interest I had left. Then the rest of the trailer somehow got worse with the llama scene, whatever that was.

    They should have made the movie animated in the same style as all their commercials, with the characters in a Minecraft style skin based on their real world appearance. Have them start and end in real life, whatever. But boy is this not going to be good.

    This looks like the 90s Mario movie all over again. Or the Sonic movie -- before they fixed Sonic. Like, even the Resident Evil and Tomb Raider movies are probably better than this and those movies were generally very inaccurate to their source material, and not well receieved.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Showed this to my kids. Their reaction was:

    Kid 1: bruh

    Kid 2: Is that the guy from Peaches?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I wouldn't watch it even if the trailer was really good but....I'm gonna shit on it for looking awful, not being targeted towards adults. That opening green screen shot looks AWFUL. I said in another thread it reminds me of those old car commercial edits with the Mark guy. The perspectives of the camera vs the background don't seem to fit

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Great article, because it applies to anyone who reads it.

  • source
  • [+] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Reminder: Jack Black broke up Tenacious D to try to save this thing

    and...

    "Oh, no see, you're mad, but you see this version of the franchise isn't for you. It's for a new crowd that was alienated by the previous version and you need to be nice and let them have their..."

    Shut the fuck up, if it's a version of a thing made for people who are defined by not liking the thing, it's not going to get the other crowd to like the thing, it's just going to piss off the people who do like it...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    But the movie looks bad. That's why people are mad.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Of course not.

    I have taste.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's meant for whom, exactly?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago*

    They could be pulling a 'sonic movie' move here, releasing a terrible trailer to gather heat and information.

    Though the sonic movie only had Sonic to change

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›