133
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The attacks have been able to disrupt shipping and keep the U.S. and its allies tied down, frustrating the Navy’s decades-old mission of keeping open the region’s critical sea lanes.

American military says it has spent about $1 billion fighting Ansar Allah to support Israel's Gaza War. It has conducted more than 450 strikes and intercepting 200 drones and missiles.

U.S. officials worry that the conflict is simply not sustainable.

“Their supply of weapons from Iran is cheap and highly sustainable, but ours is expensive and our logistics tails are long. We are playing whack-a-mole, and they are playing a long game.”

https://archive.ph/VbNKQ

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 120 points 1 year ago

Though largely ineffective, the Houthi attacks have been able to disrupt shipping and keep the U.S. and its allies tied down,

thinking-about-it

[-] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean this comes from a complete misunderstanding of the objective of the Houthi attacks. Yes they have been "ineffective" at directly hitting a NATO military ship, but that's not the primary goal here, the goal is to disrupt trade with Israel and their allies, and on that basis the attacks have been very successful. It's always a big mistake to view the success of military operations from a military standpoint only. That kind of logic is what makes the US think they could've won the Vietnam war or beat the Taliban if they just fought for longer or fought differently. Wars are complex multifaceted endeavours, you can't just look at the direct military aspect. Many have won the direct military battle but lost the actual war. Real life is not a multiplayer shooting game where having a better K/D or holding down a certain objective means that you win the war.

[-] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago

It's not an innocent misunderstanding, it's intentional propaganda. If you redefine your opponent's goal to something it's not, when your opponent doesn't achieve that goal you can claim victory.

Remember all that "Kiev in 3 days" bullshit that came from a US officer and was spread all over the internet?

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

God I still see that regularly. Like every single usual suspect subreddit has at least one person doing the "Day 943 of the 3 day Special Military Operation smuglord "

[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Real life is not a multiplayer shooting game where having a better K/D means that you win the war

Funny enough, as you may know, the American empire made it a priority in Vietnam to inflict as many casualties on the Vietnamese as possible. Usually this led to civilian massacres as soldiers try to keep up with demand of their superiors to kill as many people as possible.

And to this day, when you bring up that the US lost Vietnam, people cope and screech "uhhhh BUT WE KILLED 3 MILLION AND ONLY LOST 58,000 TROOPS frothingfash :smuglord: "

It's incredible and scary how normalized casual brutality is brushed off in the West™ when "our" team does it in a war.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

in the West™

Disturbing that this really does apply across the board; I recall explaining to Western European players (or trying to actually) that Russia and China were necessary balancing powers against us cause otherwise the global South would look like Cambodia, Vietnam and Iraq, and they were seriously trying to defend the mass slaughter, thinking 'they were run by brutal dictators' is a defense of mass killings in the scale of millions. If the channel didn't put a restriction on how often you post, I would've asked how that justifies mass slaughtering people,but honestly I don't think I was going to change anyone's mind who thinks what we did in Cambodia and Vietnam was defensible

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

As Clausewitz famously said, War is when you try to get the highest number

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

I don’t think “real life” is in the US’ DNA.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Stellaris' players almost universally complain that rival nations don't concede during wars if you defeat their fleets and space stations, but don't take any planets and don't knock out their allies. Its comical that people are upset that imperialism does work how they wished it worked, and instead operates somewhat realistically where nations don't concede just because you knock out their militarized space navy. They fight to the dirty end on the ground, especially if they have friends back them up.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

"We only lost because we're too nice to use nukes!"

[-] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago

man I wish I were as ineffective as Ansar Allah

[-] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago

Task failed successfully

[-] [email protected] 101 points 1 year ago

frustrating the Navy’s decades-old mission of keeping open the region’s critical sea lanes.

It’s literally so easy lol. Stop funding genocide and they stop blowing your shit up

[-] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago

They should put you in charge of an aircraft carrier

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

So that Ansar Allah will have an aircraft carrier?

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

But that would frustrate the century-old mission

[-] [email protected] 77 points 1 year ago

“Their supply of weapons from Iran is cheap and highly sustainable, but ours is expensive and our logistics tails are long."

How can they understand this in this context but absolutely not when talking about Ukraine or China?

[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago

Lockheed said their next generation hyper tactical liberty ballistic precision missile will cost $36,000,000 each because it’s too sophisticated to explain. We have no choice but to accept their price

[-] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

This is a very well understood and planned for weakness you absolute dolls, you nimrods. If it takes a $500k or more missile to take out a 10k or less drone, that drone being shot down is still a win.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

A french naval officer was quoted at the beginning of Prosperity Guardian as saying "if you use a $5m missile to shoot down a $5 thousand drone, then in fact it is your missile which has been shot down by the drone."

[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did Yemen ever learn why the US doesn’t have free healthcare?

[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago

I think they did when they shot down the reaper drone. Then they expressed sorrow for the American people because they said the government will prioritize creating a new drone instead of using the funds to treat sick people lol

[-] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago

Multiple times, but it wasn't very effective as Ansar Allah have developed many countermeasures to reduce the effectiveness of airstrikes, due to being under a much more intense Saudi Arabian led aerial bombardment for nearly a decade. At most the US took out their air defences for a little bit, and hit some above ground munitions.

[-] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago

Sounds like they've invented a new form of sea-based guerilla warfare and good on them for it.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

Insurance warfare

[-] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago

The part I love the most is that the US is taking such a huge financial hit to defend against relatively inexpensive attacks. It seems so fitting that the worlds richest nation can be bled like this.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

It's funny to me that the media will get people to laugh at these weapons and not see that it's a well thought out tactic. The US is going to double down on expensive equipment before anything changes. They'll have the most expensive and sophisticated weaponry, but they won't be able to afford to use it

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Indeed, it seems that the entire military doctrine US has relied upon is being invalidated by modern technology.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The attacks don’t even have to sink a ship to take effect. The insurance cost alone is enough to cause detours around Africa.

[-] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If Ansar Allah have found out why we don't have healthcare, any chance they can tell us what that is?

[-] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago

My enemy keeps throwing pebbles at my house and I'm blocking them with flaming suitcases with a million dollars in each. Anyway, can you help me figure out why I can't afford to send my kids to the doctor?

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

excuse me but Ansarallah has a navy you can see the boats in this video here DEFCON 1 at the Gates of Grief

[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

We love our beautiful boaters, don't we?a-little-trolling

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Damn, the Krackkker Capital needs to step up it's propaganda game if this is what the competition's look like. That shit is dope.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

To quote their slogan

God is the Greatest

Death to America

Death to Israel

A Curse Upon the Jews

Victory to Islam

Four out of five ain’t bad, this is what we have critical support for.

[-] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

❌️✔️✔️❌️❌️

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

سُـبْحانَ الله

this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
133 points (100.0% liked)

news

24135 readers
663 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS