Nukes the supreme court
Don't do that. Don't give me hope.
this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
51 points (74.3% liked)
politics
19072 readers
4552 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The title reminds me of my silliest Reddit ban. I was banned for suggesting that Clarence Thomas be crushed by a sea mine.
I was banned for saying riot police should quit their jobs after RvW
You should have claimed typo, meaning to have typed "mime"
It’s not the Cheney MO. Now if they said she peppered them with buckshot…
is “nuke” the new “slam”?
Liz Cheney SKULLFUCKS Supreme Court
Liz Cheney HORNSWOGGLES Supreme Court AND DIPS 'EM IN TURDS
Liz Cheney TARS AND FEATHERS Supreme Court and RIDES THEM OUT ON A RAIL
Liz Cheney TREATS Supreme Court TO A SURF 'N' TURF DINNER AND KARAOKE AFTERWARDS FOR THEIR BIRTHDAY
Liz, noooo!
Ugh it seems like it. The article is also listed under the “five-alarm fire” category, which no, it’s not that. I hate all these meaningless buzzy words.
It’s basically “Five-alarm fire after Liz Cheney nukes the Supreme Court.” But, like, why?? Why the hell use words that don’t mean what they say? Especially when the actual meanings of those words are so specific and extreme?
I nuked some frozen veggies last night. Maybe they mean, she warmed the SCOTUS in the microwave.
They NUKED and SHOCKED the industry
POW, BAM, KAPOW!!
I hate it. It's like "literally."
Literally "literally", smh
I wish it was just hyperbole. I mean, a low. Up scotus could stop a lot of the bullshit,
(Okay I don’t actually wish it, but still . I don’t think these idiots like Thomas and Barrett understand just how vile they are and how close they are to being illegitimate.)
You can't escalate headlines so quickly or you'll run out of click bait words too fast.
What will the poor editors be stuck with in 10 years? "Trump DESTROYS THE UNIVERSE AND ALL THINGS GOOD with a tweet about farting on a Democrat."
There’s still a lot we don’t know about what Trump did on January 6. And the Supreme Court may prevent us from ever knowing it.
Nothing stopping an official/politician who knows from holding a press conference though (assuming it's not classified).
gasp Now I want to start adding Creative Commons sigs to all of my posts, too! The links will quickly becoming annoying, but I can just reuse an uploaded pic - some fonts actually have included the Creative Commons code space (1F10D-1F10F, 1F16D-1F16F, but it's not reliable yet unless you can control the display font like in web or a applications.
Unicode glyphs: 🅭 🅯
HTML encoded: 🅭 🅮 🄏 🄎
Image:
Edit: bummer on the glyphs; they don't show up in my client, and changing fonts on Android is stupid hard. Gonna have to resize that image, too; it sort of dominates everything.
The links will quickly becoming annoying, but I can just reuse an uploaded pic
Okay, I'll bite. Why would the link be annoying, but the pic wouldn't?
IMO the pic is much more in your face.
Only because my first pass was huge! If I can tune it down, it'll be less obtrusive. Part of this is the client, though. Hyperlinks in Voyager are duplicated as a big, ugly list at the end of every post containing them.
E.g.
~~Dammit! I halved the size, but it's worse. I'll get it right, eventually.~~
Hah! Getting there. Maybe if I move it off to the right...
Nukes? I've headlight editors giving up on slams? Skipped eviscerated and went straight to nuked huh?