Picard isn't good Star Trek, but Discovery is just bad on another level.
this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)
Movies & TV
22878 readers
168 users here now
Rules for Movies & TV Discussion
-
Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
-
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
-
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.
Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Picard is worse.
Nooooo how could they do this to Star Trek: Michael Burnham?
i'm screaming and crying rn just like every good starfleet officer does
I don't even dislike the character of Michael, I just hate how much the show focuses on her instead of any of the other characters. Classic Trek was always an ensemble show with all of the senior staff getting their own character development and adventures.
At this point I feel like I know more about Keiko Obrien than I know about Discovery's doctor.
Kurtzman has also teased the development of another potential spinoff, Star Trek: Academy, which would focus on a new generation of young cadets.
No goddamn it. I thought his contract was up?
Kurtzman has also teased the development of another potential spinoff, Star Trek: Academy, which would focus on a new generation of young cadets.
I wonder if it'd focus on idealistic aspiring explorers seeking new life and new civilizations or if it'd be more :awooga: :libertarian-alert: :hypersus:
my guess is he's trying to glob onto Lower Decks' success
But Lower Decks is actually good because Kurtzman had nothing to do with it except his name in the credits in a hands-off position.