[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Is that Homsar?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Is that a Rainwing?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Run dmesg -w or dmesg --follow, press control-L to clear the screen (all of that stuff is irrelevant), then plug in and unplug the drive a few times. If you get messages, then the kernel can recognize the drive. Press control-C when you're done.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Don't press X, it's insecure to SSH attacks. Press Wayland instead.

4
Symbol test (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

quote, ampersand, less than, greater than " & < >other text goes here, this is unaffected

8
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Quotation marks and other symbols, when typed in the title of a spoiler tag, show up as broken HTML entities.
This only happens on the normal website. Other Lemmy UIs (Tesseract, old-reddit style, Photon, Alexandrite) are not affected.

Examples of characters:
" becomes &quot;
& becomes &amp;
< becomes &lt;
> becomes &gt;

Example occurrence:

quote, ampersand, less than, greater than " & < >Expected correct result: " & < >
Expected erroneous result: &quot; &amp; &lt; &gt;

Warning: The following spoilers contain full-page screenshots of the phenomenon in question. Do not open on a slow or metered connection.

Normal website section.On sh.itjust.works:

On lemmy.world:

On lemmy.blahaj.zone:

On lemmy.dbzer0.com:

Alternative UI section.On sh.itjust.works, Tesseract version:

On lemmy.world, old-reddit style version:

On lemmy.world, Photon version:

On lemmy.world, Alexandrite version:

3
Quotation marks test (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Double quote section

"quotes"
"quotes in italics"
"quotes in bold"
"quotes in bold italics"
~~quotes in strikethrough~~

"quotes in a header"

"quotes in a block quote"
"quotes in code"

"quotes in a code block"
"more quotes in a code block"

"all the quotes in a spoiler""quotes"
"quotes in italics"
"quotes in bold"
"quotes in bold italics"
~~"quotes in strikethrough"~~

"quotes in a header"

"quotes in a block quote"
"quotes in code"

"quotes in a code block"
"more quotes in a code block"

114
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

My main focus isn't on quality of results.

The real problem is, whenever I type a query that's even the slightest bit out of the ordinary, I get no results. Google, Duckduckgo, Startpage, Searx, all of them.

It strains credibility that these advanced pieces of technology could not find anything among billions of websites, when in the past, less-advanced versions of these engines could find results for similar queries among smaller numbers of websites.

To reiterate: My problem is not with SEO, or spam, or AI-generated websites, or irrelevant results. My problem is getting no results much more frequently than in the past.

6
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/37176001

This was created by u/SenecaR0cks on Reddit, I do not own it

Source (reddit frontend)

24
Sol (art by Dschunai) (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This was created by Dschunai on Deviantart, I do not own it

Source

4
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Original title: Presenting General Falcon of the SkyWings. The latest OC of mine bought to life by the highly talented SinisterEternity over on Twitter! ^^ Love how they managed to capture the fierce expression, and the spear looks even better than how I'd imagined it! https://twitter.com/SinisterEterniT

This was created by SinisterEterniT on Xitter, as a commission for ShadowClaw98 on Reddit; I do not own it.

Intermediate source (reddit frontend)

Original source (xitter frontend)

267
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
51
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
56
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago

Was she wearing cargo pants? Did she have a subway map poster on her wall?

https://xkcd.com/806/

13
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/37507334

I'm trying to generate AppArmor policies to secure my "major/internet-facing" programs.
Most of those programs are Flatpaks.
Flatpaks already have their own sandboxing mechanism, which uses bwrap and XDG portals.
Does AppArmor have any weird interactions with Flatpak, e. g. blocking too much, or blocking too little, or being unable to block anything without rendering the whole program unusable?

2
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago
  1. You can't win
  2. You can't break even
  3. You can't get out of the game
[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

That's the condensation pump. Without it, your furnace would build up condensation.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago

Gonna be like the Vietnam War. High tech powerful army vs low tech actually competent guerrillas. Amish gonna win.

view more: next ›

DeltaWingDragon

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago