Apparently we got our floppies for cheap because we just had a whole bunch of pirated floppies.

Admittedly, some did have multiple games on them. That's what LOAD"$",8 was for.

LOAD"*",8,1

SEARCHING FOR *  
LOADING  
READY.  
RUN

Very true. Good coworkers can make work a lot more bearable.

Looking a bit into the company's business can help, too. If they do something vaguely interesting that can be a bonus. I ignored that once in favor of perks and that got me into the complete disaster area that is fintech. Don't make the same mistake.

I wouldn't have gotten that far. That utter savage can't even tell the difference between MT/s and MB/s.

230 bucks? I usually paid twice that. Then I spent 7000 bucks on getting ICLs implanted. The years later my eyes got worse again so now I'm wearing glasses again plus I'm a bit farsighted from the ICLs.

But those glasses are only at -2 dpt and are so comparatively cheap that I'm still saving money over my expected lifespan.

So. Fucking. Worth. It.

Planes generally don't go on rails so maybe that's a factor.

Das Millionenspiel.

It's The Running Man except twelve years earlier and a media satire instead of an action movie. It comments on TV phenomena that wouldn't exist in Germany until two decades later (like scripted "reality" TV). Also, it has early appearances of one of Germany's most famous TV hosts (as the show's host, fittingly) and one of Germany's most famous comedians of the 70s to 90s (in a completely serious role, unfittingly). And unlike the Schwarzenegger movie it doesn't construct a dystopian future to introduce public bloodsports but merely gives a terse reference to a "law on active recreation" dated three years after the movie first aired.

To make it even more odd, it's actually a good movie despite being from Germany and made for TV.

Given the usual quality of BIOS/UEFI option descriptions it's remarkably close to being sensible. I would've expected something like "enables limiting CPUID maximum value".

It's Microsoft Copy of Teams (New) (2).

AI isn't taking off because it took off in the 60s. Heck, they were even working on neural nets back then. Same as in the 90s when they actually got them to be useful in a production environment.

We got a deep learning craze in the 2010s and then bolted that onto neural nets to get the current wave of "transformers/diffusion models will solve all problems". They're really just today's LISP machines; expected to take over everything but unlikely to actually succeed.

Notably, deep learning assumes that better results come from a bigger dataset but we already trained our existing models on the sum total of all of humanity's writings. In fact, current training is hampered by the fact that a substantial amount of all new content is already AI-generated.

Despite how much the current approach is hyped by the tech companies, I can't see it delivering further substantial improvements by just throwing more data (which doesn't exist) or processing power at the problem.

We need a systemically different approach and while it seems like there's all the money in the world to fund the necessary research, the same seemed true in the 50s, the 60s, the 80s, the 90s, the 10s... In the end, a new AI winter will come as people realize that the current approach won't live up to their unrealistic expectations. Ten to fifteen years later some new approach will come out of underfunded basic research.

And it's all just a little bit of history repeating.

That should be private string? Gender. Explicit nullables are your friends.

I remember the early 2000s when basically 90% of all Americans were absolutely certain that jihadists were going to attack their local supermarket any minute now because Power Cable, Nebraska was such a strategic target.

Heck, there was a bomb scare because of an advertisement campaign for Aqua Teen Hunger Force that involved placing PCBs with LEDs on them that would display characters from the show. Because surely Al Quaeda would put conspicuous LED displays on their bombs.

News media want people to panic so they keep tuning in. Panicked people tend to come up with remarkably stupid scenarios like "Al Quaeda have unlimited resources and can show up anywhere to shoot people at random" or "Hamas want to take Dorcester as a strategic location to strike at Israel from".