I started using linux full time about a year ago. I started with Arch, but moved to Cachy really quickly when I discovered it. All of the advantages of Arch, but repos optimised for modern hardware, and a whole heap of useful pre-configured tools, like Wine/Proton, fish, snapper etc. Arch is a bare bones, pick and configure your own setup rolling release distro. Cachy is a pre-optimised, rolling release distro with lots of useful stuff right out of the box.

The one thing I've been thinking about (but haven't yet done) is using it for the Insta 360 camera app (an app for editing/exporting videos from 360 panoramic cameras). It's actually more feature rich than the desktop version, which doesn't have a linux version in any case, so using it to quickly reframe my videos and export them to something non proprietary would be a whole lot easier...

Maybe I'll try and get that working today...

At the moment, its challenging for creators to generate income from Peertube. In theory, the avenue they have is through patreons and the like, but in practice, peertube doesn't yet have the volume of users to make that work. And as a result, it's going to be hard to use any kind of "premium/paid" tier service, simply because there won't be many takers.

In my mind, right now, if you're trying to attract creators, you're going to need to reduce as many barriers as you can for them to move over. That may mean co-existing accounts on bigtech platforms and on peertube, and in terms of helping with your running costs, voluntary donations are the best way of doing it for now, until peertube gets a larger volume of users.

Either way, we spun up our own peertube instance a few weeks ago too, so welcome to the vidiverse :)

As always, love your work. Tess is my daily driver for lemmy

There is, by forking lemmy and removing it. We already do that anyway, so we'll look in to seeing what we can do.

In the mean time, we offer a bunch of other frontends aside from the default lemmy UI, and they will all bypass this problem

No, he was not unbanned, and he won't be unless a genuine walkback of his previous stance is made

To me at least, "ignore" implies a server level block of some kind that would be consistent across clients.

Where are you seeing that? I can't find it in the WebUI

Australia

Would like to end up in Argentina or Uruguay though!

That would be a pretty useful feature for a lot of people, especially if you could apply it to a community level. I know lots of people block meme communities etc, but having an option to auto collapse/hide them, but still access them if needed would make things easier for many folk

The best help you can give someone in distress is hearing them, whilst you redirect them to a place that can help with empathy and compassion.

Any form of automated message comes across as the exact opposite of empathy and compassion.

In addition, speaking as the admin of a trans and queer community, I don't have any special tools or abilities to help people. Sending the report to me doesn't let me help them, because they're almost certainly not in my country, and I don't have any special access that enables me to contact them or reach out to them. The tool I do have, is the instance itself that we host, that allows people to connect with their community and their peers, that allows them to struggle, and that shuts down anyone who would try and add to the hurt of someone on the edge.

Which is to say, I don't think a reddit style feature has a place here. It will let people think they're helping, without actually doing so, as well as providing a new vector for abuse (though that would be less of an issue than on reddit). In theory, an automated list of resources that could be called on could be useful, but again, if someone is struggling, they need to feel heard, and automated replies can come across as dispassionate and uncaring.

She makes money from the popularity of her IP, whether or not she makes money from any individual title. The success of that game makes her money, because it tells studios that it is profitable to make Potter content, and that will make her money.

So no, do not purchase her stuff, because she will explicitly use her profits from her IP to actively target and hurt trans folk.

This isn't hypothetical. It's not multiple steps removed. It's not "there's no ethical consumption under capitalism". This is someone who is explicitly using her money to hurt vulnerable people, so you do not give her more money or encourage others to.

Ever.