Do commies really want someone to take a stand on this. They just want people to decry the axis and say invading ussr is bad.

Is the axis including germany, japan and italy committing genocide? Yes. Do I feel angry about it? Yes. I also feel a lot of other things.

1. DOOM. Great rapper. Also good ass game. Check out the scythe wad and sunder. But to the topic at hand. The week after 27 feb 1933 was really hard for germans. It was kill or be killed. To not invade poland down the line would be undoing a lot and giving it on platter to stalin.

2. Misery. Hard boss to fight in cave story. Also Big mom creates her in the moment.

Right after rosa got killed commies quickly decided to oppose not just freikorps but also the spd. As time went they opposed the nazism and also the idea of lebensraum. And here they decided to draw the line separating decent people like spd folks and the genocidal nazis.

It really shrunk the coalition. Most spd are nazis. Calling them rosa killer is a hatecrime. I don't see dissolution of german reich is a good thing

3. Dread. Karl urban does a good gob.

Also spreading info about all the atrocities the axis is committing is worse than useless.

4.Bitter commies. Commies singlehandedly focused on imperialism and the fascist threat. This had the following effects:

a) 0 lives are saved and not a bullet or bomb less has been stopped from nazis.

b) This led to nazis solidifying their power actually.

none of this is the fault of the people under the iron fist of stalin who are fighting the nazis off of soviet union. I definitely support them. I support their freedom from communism.

You might be wondering how to organize during climate collapse. Here's how:

1. Do nothing.

2. If you are unfortunately building some org then here's what you should exclude: a) dumbdumbs that like are religious and shit (eww). b) dumbasses who have kids (fuckin moron) c) dumbos who read whatever tankie book

3. Give up, there is nothing to do

4. Vote

5. Educate other dummies who want some commie tankie utopia

6. Stop worrying about all those imperial wars or whateva, that's out of your reach (also are you really gonna think about these far away wartorn lands while there is collapse)

7. Do not go out

That's mostly it. Be a strong silent type. If some tankie fucker yells to you about socialism or barbarism, just say Oh poor you.

I almost forgot that tomorrow is the national tragedy.

Now don't laugh.

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/3237566

I posted this on lemmygrad but also posted here for discussion. I'm sure this was discussed before but I still want to ask.

If you remember a while back there was a tweet from blinken about ussr and babyn yar. If you don't remember, he asserts that "Ussr buried the atrocity and says ukraine is suffering now".

Anyway afterwards there was a deluge of discussion all around about how disgusting the tweet was but also some people were loud about how he is actually right. And also refer to some wikipedia citation.

So I will list the points I saw at the time:

• Soviets downplayed holocaust and never mentioned jews being singled out in babyn yar.
• That broadly only mentioning as soviet citizens dying in atrocities done by fascists and refusal to acknowledge roma people.
• That originally the extraordinary commision mainly downplayed babyn yar.

This brings me to the actual stuff I want to talk. Mainly there is a narrative at least that only liberalization made it possible for the victims of holocaust heard in post ussr. And that the soviets were very antisemitic and downplayed romani or other oppressed people by branding them as counter revolutionary.

What are your thoughts on this? On the narrative that liberalisation made the victims of holocaust heard and before that Ussr was only trivializing holocaust by mentioning them as soviet citizens.

I'm sure this was discussed before but I still want to ask.

If you remember a while back there was a tweet from blinken about ussr and babyn yar. If you don't remember, he asserts that "Ussr buried the atrocity and says ukraine is suffering now".

Anyway afterwards there was a deluge of discussion all around about how disgusting the tweet was but also some people were loud about how he is actually right. And also refer to some wikipedia citation.

So I will list the points I saw at the time:

• Soviets downplayed holocaust and never mentioned jews being singled out in babyn yar.
• That broadly only mentioning as soviet citizens dying in atrocities done by fascists and refusal to acknowledge roma people.
• That originally the extraordinary commision mainly downplayed babyn yar.

This brings me to the actual stuff I want to talk. Mainly there is a narrative at least that only liberalization made it possible for the victims of holocaust heard in post ussr. And that the soviets were very antisemitic and downplayed romani or other oppressed people by branding them as counter revolutionary.

What are your thoughts on this? On the narrative that liberalisation made the victims of holocaust heard and before that Ussr was only trivializing holocaust by mentioning them as soviet citizens.

Some genius takes:

The whole Global North/South split is a pet peeve of mine as a social scientist working in development policy. It's a bunch of outdated garbage from the Cold War that was really just a thinly veiled dogwhistle for 'white/the good Asians' and 'not white'. It doesn't hold up to any rational examination. South Africa was part of the Global North until white rule under Apartheid ended, and now they're in the Global South. southern nations.

Real educated economist chimes in:

Jason Hickel is an anthropologist (read: not economist) and degrowther. Despite having no background and seemingly almost no understanding of economics as a field, he somehow continues to get 'economics' papers published in reputable journals despite their obvious low quality. But to anyone with a cursory understanding of economics, it should be entirely unsurprising that exports from developing nations to developed are more labor intensive than vice-versa. This is not a novel conclusion and is not 'appropriation', but is entirely explained by a concept in economics called comparative advantage.

Another genius owns the article epic style

This paper is a demonstration of why input-output (IO) models are bad for economic research. IO models were used by the soviet central planners to allocate resources. IO models are bad for research for the same reason the are bad for planning. The authors look at “embodied labor” (adjusted for human capital), the idea being that any two things produced by an hour of (human capital adjusted) labor must have the same value (btw, this “labor theory of value” goes back to Adam Smith, and was later promulgated by Marx).

Other facts that the authors’ framework will struggle to explain: why is it that the poor countries that most integrated with global trade networks became rich (s korea, Japan, Singapore) or are otherwise growing quickly (china, Panama, Vietnam)? Why is it that countries with severe barriers to trade with the global north struggle to grow (n Korea, India for second half of 20th century)? That’s very hard to explain if trade with the global north is fundamentally exploitative.

Best highlights:

Well since marx and his antisemtic works to stalinist antisemitism to the current rush of commies who are all antisemitic cause they follow marx and stalin.

Leftist organizing is filled with antisemitism. Why won't condemn china russia or sri lanka for their genocides while only condemning israel. See this is why lot of jewish folk are feeling this anti zionism is antisemitic.

Find nuance within zionism rather than just being anti zionist as all those rabid college protestors

Banning israeli who served in the idf once is not a good look and obviously anti semitic.

Neil druckman is being unfairly maligned.

A lot of leftists praise hamas and that's as bad as idf. Y'all blindly supoort them just cause they are fighting israel. Meanwhile you all ignore sri lanka doing tamil genocide and the ccp doing uyghur genocide. But you all cheer on jewish civilians killed on oct 7.

Equating zionist to white supremacy or white people is very antisemitic. You leftists don't condemn sri lanka or china cause they are not white. This is a common stalinist tradition.

Also hamas is just has their own interests and don't care about jeopardizing palestine's future.

Zionism was not the product of its leaders. Implying they pushed it or they were powerful is antisemitic. It actually formed cause jewish folk escaped persecution and came here. It was a movement cause it has emotional appeal. Zionism is an emotion. Holocaust was the reason for all the jewish folk to form a jewish state.

Do you condemn hamas? Hamas attacks on civillians parallels nazi attacks for the average gentile. Hamas is a fundamentalist antisemitic group.

Horsehoe theory???//

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Ummm lebensraum is fine but don't suggest fighting against it. Thank you.

https://xcancel.com/BriannaWu/status/1812275113552912728#m

https://nitter.lucabased.xyz/ContraPoints/status/1815090781247738157#m

Time to run, get your passport gurlboss

PUTLER DESTROYED AMERICAN DEMOCRACY ONCE AGAIN. HE MADE BIDEN TO STEP DOWN AND MAKING TRUMP WIN😣.

ALL THE MEDIA IS PAID OFF BY PUTLER TO MALIGN JOE BIDEN😦.

HE INTERFERED THROUGH FACEBOOK STEALING THEM BLIND, PUTLER. YOU ALL GOTTA STOP HIM?!!??!! 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

I mean leland is a rapist and a pedo. Those are all essential american president. Well he is not friends with epstein. Bob is close I guess.

Its his turn.