[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Look up the Firefox plugin "down them all". Then load this page: https://www.marxists.org/ebooks/index.htm#ebooksinenglish

You can use down them all to mass download all files linked in a page and use the meta data of the site to build a output path that should organize them all.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yep, S&R is a fantastic read for how succinct it is. One thing I see people sometimes neglecting is the concept of a "stateless" society in the Marxist conception having "foremen and accountants," but recognizing that once all property has been sublimated, there is no class distinction, and the oppressive aspects of societal formations lack that backing.

Yeah, it's something that is difficult to conceptualize, but I understand the logic. As everyone participates in the maintenance of society, given enough time, there will be no distinction between "the state" and everything else. There does seem to be one glaring issue in this logic, however, which is that a state doesn't exist in isolation from other states. Maybe this is dealt with in "Imperialism," but the defense of the proletarian state seems to demand the strengthening and hardening of the state, as opposed to the withering away. Capitalist encirclement drove USSR's heavy industry, its foreign policy, its internal policy regarding dissidents, and so on. Stalin naturally had a much clearer idea of this influence, as he ultimately experienced the most of it throughout his life. I'll have to give his theory of "Socialism in One Country" a read at some point. It feels like this influence is glossed over by Marx and Lenin. Maybe I need more reading, but it would seem that the "withering away" can only truly be achieved through global proletarian dictatorship. Maybe that's how Lenin and Marx felt at the time they wrote their texts, that global proletarian revolution was just around the corner.

S&R really makes me want to find some readings on what the Soviet Union's actual political systems were like over the decades. What things were like right after the revolution, and how did those systems evolve? I'd love to read about the political organizations inside of places like Cuba, and China, and learn how those evolved as well. All the Marxist-Leninist countries must have had their own struggles that shaped their internal political structures and processes, and I'd be curious to see how much they're the same and how much they differ.

What is to be Done? is definitely a product of its time with how it names certain groups and issues, but the core is relevant to this day. Just keep that in mind!

Yeah, this is what I hear about the book. I wonder if an edit or reorganization of the text would be more beneficial to our time. I felt the same way about all the discussion about various Social Democrats in S&R, it felt like I was missing a lot of context from the time period to really grasp what Lenin was disproving or proving. What I did gather, though, which is easy enough to parse through the text, is that the opportunists, as he called them, were simply coopting Maxian language and ideas for the preservation of capitalism.

Also, if you haven't read Imperialism, it's easily my favorite work of Lenin's.

I've got imperialism on my list. I think I'm going to save it for last. After I read What Is to Be Done, I'm going to move to Left-Wing Communism and then to Imperialism.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

Thanks! I'll have to add Marx Madness to my podcast list.

55
submitted 13 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Fifteen days ago I started reading "State and Revolution" after discovering it was hella short! Yesterday, I managed to finish it! Today, I'm beginning "What Is to Be Done?" because it is also hella short!

I'll probably go back and read State and Revolution again at some point, just to reinforce its ideas. Here is my takeaways after finishing the book:

Clear definition of the state and its function. This was something I understood but couldn't fully articulate.

"The state is a product and a manifestation of the irreconcilability of class antagonisms. The state arises where, when and insofar as class antagonism objectively cannot be reconciled. And, conversely, the existence of the state proves that the class antagonisms are irreconcilable"

In reality, however, the state is nothing but a machine for the oppression of one class by another, and indeed in the democratic republic no less than in the monarchy. And at best it is an evil inherited by the proletariat after its victorious struggle for class supremacy, whose worst sides the victorious proletariat will have to lop off as speedily as possible, just as the Commune had to, until a generation reared in new, free social conditions is able to discard the entire lumber of the state.

The state is nothing but a machine for the oppression of one class by another. This is such a succinct description by Engels.

Lenin makes it clear that the process involved in his vision of revolution to communism is a long process, one that may even take generations to complete. The process being:

  • Capitalism.
  • proletarian revolution and smashing of the bourgeois state.
  • implementation of the proletarian state and its dictatorship over exploitative forces.
  • the socialist period, stamped with the birthmark of capitalist society.
  • The withering away of the proletarian state, as state functions become simple "control and administration" operated by "foremen and accountants."
  • Communism.

It's amusing to see not much has changed in the political landscape. We still have arguments today about using the current state system to "democratically" transform the state from capitalist to socialist. It's the same opportunism expressed back then. Lots of talk about "democratic republics" and just how compatible they are with capitalism. In his critique of the anarchists of his time, he accuses them of seeking "overnight" abolition of the state and not seeing the need to defend against bourgeois counter-revolution. I know very little about historical anarchism, so I'll have to take his word on that one. These kinds of reads also add more to my reading list. I'm now very interested in reading Marx's analysis of the Paris Commune.

Much of the book was stuff I already "understood," but it was nice to read where these ideas are rooted. The best part of the book for me, though, was Chapter 7. It ends abruptly, and the postscript after reads:

This pamphlet was written in August and September 1917. I had already drawn up the plan for the next, the seventh chapter, “The Experience of the Russian Revolutions of 1905 and 1917”. Apart from the title, however, I had no time to write a single line of the chapter; I was “interrupted” by a political crisis — the eve of the October revolution of 1917. Such an “interruption” can only be welcomed; but the writing of the second part of this pamphlet (“The Experience of the Russian Revolutions of 1905 and 1917”) will probably have to be put off for a long time. It is more pleasant and useful to go through the “experience of revolution” than to write about it.

It is more pleasant and useful to go through the “experience of revolution” than to write about it.

My immediate thought was, "You did it. You fucking did it." It reads like a kind of walk-off into the sunset.

I look forward to reading the rest of his works. It was a very enjoyable read, even if I was a little lost in the history.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I felt this way today, didn't get the chance to sit in s quite space until everyone was sleeping. It's just nice to experience the stillness. I love the night. I think if I could, I'd stay up till 3am just to sit in that stillness for longer. It's like by brain craves it.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Na they don't have a separate economic wing for this. They understand what drives everything in the system. Its labor. If the Federation needs something from the Ferangi, they have labor to trade. They send technicians to perform some form of high end labor. This would be like, high end system design, automation design, energy optimization, lawyers and legal design, terraforming and habitat restoration, or large scale construction.

There are probably a lot of redlines however, which makes them a hard negotiator. The wage consortiums like Farangi know that they can fall back on the federations unlimited asset supply, and can negotiate for how ever many self sealing stem bolts as they need. They also know not to crash their own economy with this asset, and very likely the federation knows they hold the power to totally crash any wage economy. It's probably baked into the Prime Directive.

I mean they canonically converted that capitalist they unfroze into the ambassador to Franginar! He didn't run off to become some leader of a wage consortium. He became an ambassador to Franginar because he had real life capitalist experienced instead of historical theoretical understanding of capitalism.

So I think they just provide people labor for trade. They also likely keep stocks of latinem and they do it by periodically trading labor for latinem or more likely commodities they replicate for latinem.

Most currencies are going to be digital in Star Trek. Gold Pressed Latinem is just the asset that backs up the currency used by Farangi. Quark likely keeps his own physical latinem on hand, and uses it on the dabo wheels for the novelty of it, since 99% of his patrons are federation or bejorin. The crew must have some way to shore up the tab at quarks and I think they do that with labor. Sure, some of them probably hold Latinem for when they don't want to fix stuff at quarks, but they must also perform labor and provide logistics for quark to make the relationship square for him. He likely doesn't pay rent (I can't recall) or utilities, and does have to put up with some form of federation regulations. The trade off is that the federation members get to eat and drink and socialize for free.

I'm sure I could mine all sorts of episodes to build this sketch out, but that must be how their trade works. I once saw a video that suggested, based on evidence from the show, that each crew member only worked at most 4 hours a day, maybe less to maintain the functions within the enterprise. They are so incredibly productive that they'll likely have lots of time to dedicate to other projects and tasks. This leaves a lot of time to perform some exchangeable labor to support the federation's inter system trade.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Huh the more you know!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Kids stuff is so ephemeral, here today, gone tomorrow. They grow out if it, lose it, break it, become bored of it. There will be more backpacks.

The gender stuff is very true. We don't push things onto our kids but our girl loves dresses and our boy loves trucks. They go to daycare 5 days a week. They have more hours in a week interfacing with more adults and kids then they have hours in the week interfacing with us.

That's result of both of us needing to work to support our family. So while we will retain primary influence, that secondary influence is going to be very strong.

The good thing is these norms will stand in contrast to the way you behave and how you talk about them. While most uncritical parents will raise uncritical kids who have to learn to be critical (or never do), your critical perspective will act ad a counter balance, so long as that perspective isn't oppressive (I think).

You can't escape the pressures but you'll be better equipped to explain why these pressures make no sense, because they will begin to make no sense.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I know I should pick that book up again and keep reading but life keeps getting in the way. I've turned to more digestible writings, just finishing up State and Revolution, and would be done, but I'm currently negotiating with a 2yo about nap time. (This is why I haven't finished capital 😅). The pings keep it in the front of my mental list though, so they're not wasted!

20
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

How's the family?

42
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
49
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://rss.ponder.cat/post/227673

Photo: Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg/Getty Images

With the city’s mayoral candidates officially looking toward November, the field has remained unsettled as opponents to Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani continue to bicker about the best path forward.

Mayor Eric Adams, who has shown no signs of stepping aside despite his dismal poll numbers, is trying to chip away at the presumed front-runner and writing off his fellow opponents. In a recent interview with MSNBC, Adams continued to paint Mamdani as someone who is out of touch with the average New Yorker and promising things he can’t achieve. “He is an academic elitist. He studied poverty. I lived poverty. His programs are going to impact working-class people,” Adams said.

Zohran Mamdani studied poverty. I lived it.He’s an academic elitist with plans he can’t implement, or worse, that would hurt working-class New Yorkers. Affordability is a real crisis, and I’m fighting for the people who feel it every single day. I grew up poor, joined the… pic.twitter.com/08tszOVJi5

— Eric Adams (@ericadamsfornyc) July 11, 2025

While Mamdani’s primary campaign has been praised for building an extensive coalition to defeat former governor Andrew Cuomo, Adams downplayed the achievement and suggested that the state legislator took advantage of a burgeoning movement that existed prior to him joining the race.

“He already had an army on the streets. They were already in the college campuses. They were already protesting on our streets. The Palestinian movement was already underway. There was already this energy in the streets, the anti-Trump movement,” he said. “All he had to do was pop his head up and say, ‘Hey, I’m in favor of all the stuff you guys are doing. Come join me.’ And people joined.”

Adams also continued to criticize Cuomo, who he alleged has asked him to drop out of the race in order for the former governor to mount his own independent bid against Mamdani. The mayor said that Cuomo has a history of disrespect toward Black elected officials and that he followed Adams’s lead in establishing an independent ballot line to “bamboozle” his run for reelection.

“I gave you an opportunity to go one-on-one with him. You spend $25 million. The voters heard your message. You thought you were up 32 points in the poll, you lost by 13 points. And now you want to have another bite at the apple when you didn’t get out and campaign like you should have? You didn’t walk the streets. You didn’t talk to people. You lived in a cocoon. Now, you should have another shot?” he said of Cuomo.

Cuomo, meanwhile, continues to leave the door open for that second shot at defeating Mamdani, but it remains to be seen if he’ll actively campaign. His spokesman, Rich Azzopardi, is confident that Adams will fail to win over voters, telling NBC New York of the mayor’s standing in the polls, “He’s so underwater with New York voters, he should consider growing gills.”

Despite his criticism of Cuomo, Adams is facing accusations that he, too, has pressured a candidate to drop out. In an interview with PIX11, Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa accused Adams of trying to poach voters from his party, claiming that the mayor even offered a job in his administration for his troubles.

“He’s even floated the idea that he would make me the deputy mayor of Public Safety,” Sliwa said. “Could you imagine me and Mayor Adams? We would be like two scorpions in a brandy glass.”

Adams denied that such an offer was ever made. “In no way have I ever offered Curtis Sliwa a job to drop out of the race — that’s simply false. I have not said one word to Curtis in months,” he said, per PIX11.

Though the candidates continue to be at odds, the pile of money opposing Mamdani is growing, even if there isn’t a consensus pick to spend it on yet. The Wall Street Journal reports that an independent expenditure group called New Yorkers for a Better Future Mayor 25 has launched with at least $20 million behind it with the intent of defeating Mamdani in the fall. Hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman has already signaled his support for Adams, while sources tell the Journal that former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani is expected to join forces with former Trump appointee Bo Dietl on another PAC with goals of raising $10 million. As the report points out, they’ll all also need some kind of actual plan:

Political strategists and financiers say the opening weeks of the general election have been chaotic. They complain the anti-Mamdani bulwark lacks a positive message. And a candidate. And enough voters to win. They worry the flood of outside money could backfire, and make voters suspicious of special interests.

And that would suit the front-runner just fine.


From Intelligencer - Daily News, Politics, Business, and Tech via this RSS feed

26
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
38
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

BREAK THE CHAINS OF FATIGUE! Hexbear.net™, the digital vanguard of Left Unity and Communist Solidarity, is proud to announce a truly DIALECTICAL collaboration! We've seized the means of production... of pure, unadulterated energy! Partnering with PRIME® Energy by Jake Paul, we bring you a beverage as POWERFUL as the workers' struggle and as REFRESHING as the downfall of the bourgeoisie!

FEEL THE DIALECTICAL KICK!

  • UNITE THE CLASSES IN FLAVOR! Our exclusive Tropical Punch flavor transcends petty divisions. Deliciousness knows no class! (Taste the Material Conditions!)
  • POWER TO THE PEOPLE (AND THE PICK-ME-UP)! PRIME® Energy's potent blend delivers 300mg of revolutionary caffeine. Perfect for lengthy theory sessions, spirited comrade debates, or planning the next general strike!
  • SMASH THE IMPERIALIST HYDRATION MONOPOLY! This isn't just an energy drink, it's a POLITICAL ACT against late-stage capitalism's tired, sugary hegemony!
  • AESTHETICS OF THE FUTURE, TODAY! Bold design meets revolutionary purpose. Sip from the can that says: "I critique capital while I crush my metrics!"

THIS COLLABORATION IS MORE THAN A BEVERAGE – IT'S A CALL TO ACTION!

WORKERS OF THE WORLD, HYDRATE! Feel the REVOLUTIONARY ENERGY™ coursing through your veins. One sip, and you'll understand: Solidarity is Refreshing®!

ORDER NOW AT HEXBEAR.NET/SHOP!

SUPPLY IS (DELIBERATELY) LIMITED! Participate in our PLANNED ECONOMY OF ENERGY!

No Billionaire Endorsement Implied (But Irony Fully Intended).

#PrimeRevolution #HexbearHydration #LeftUnityEnergy #SeizeTheMeansOfCaffeination #DialecticalDeliciousness

135
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/32974288

More than 20 countries are convening in Bogota next week to declare “concrete measures against Israel’s violations of international law”, diplomats told Middle East Eye.

The “emergency summit” is due to be held on 15-16 July, co-hosted by the governments of Colombia and South Africa as co-chairs of The Hague Group, to coordinate diplomatic and legal action to counter what they describe as “a climate of impunity” enabled by Israel and its powerful allies.

The founding members of the group included Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, Senegal and South Africa.

States due to take part in the summit include Algeria, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Cuba, Djibouti, Honduras, Indonesia, Ireland, Lebanon, Malaysia, Namibia, Nicaragua, Oman, Portugal, Spain, Qatar, Turkey, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay, and Palestine.

21
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Try and stop me! ecoterrorist

26
submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
77
submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
109
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
113
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

RedWizard

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF