(I know this is about Rifftrax, but we don't have a Rifftrax community.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 68 points 2 years ago (39 children)

Have we checked all food to see if exploding them makes them into something better or did we just stop with corn?

  • source
  • hideshow 39 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (18 children)

    Let me tell you a little story about brassicas... broccoli, cabbage, bok choi, cauliflower, kohlrabi, canola oil. They're all this little guy. Edit: Shit! I missed the exploding part. gracile green plant with small yellow leaves that looks nothing like broccoli

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] [S] 17 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    And yet I love broccoli but hate cauliflower.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Can you elaborate? Texture differences?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] 24 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    One tastes good, the other does not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Ya cauliflower is nast, it stinks like sweaty ugly. Brocolli is delish and the texture is perfect for sauces.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I hate raw cauliflower but boiled with rice is pretty good. By far, it's my favorite vegetable to deep fry or air fry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Imma change your life bro, Mashed Cauliflower, like you do mashed potatoes, just change the potatoes for cauliflower, so fucking smooth and tasty

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Wait kohlrabi is related to broccoli. My mind is blow since I always think of it as a root vegetable(I know it’s not but still). Also I should add to my garden this year you don’t see it very often at store and my parents and grandparents loved it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Looks similar to wild parsnip. But yeah, crazy how so many things can come from one species? Phylum? Can't remember the order of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Kevin Please Come Over For Gay Sex

    https://youtu.be/EAy58a8qqDI?si=mT35A12Hbs_K8vHE

    Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    Potatoes Apples Marijuana Bananas Tulips Etc...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] [S] 30 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Bananas are a similar one to corn too. Take something almost entirely inedible and cultivate it into something edible. Makes you wonder what convinced them to start.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Starvation was probably a good motivator

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 14 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Could be. We still don't know why people became sedentary farmers over hunter-gatherers, but it's happened many times in history.

    Somehow, farming happened independently but around the same time around the world, between 8000 and 10000 years ago. This is everywhere from Europe to the Americas to New Guinea, all apparently independently of each other!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Saying we don't know is kinda dumb though, farming allows a population group to massively outperform a hunter gatherer group in terms of food and energy collected over a year, this allows them to have more children, and results in fewer deaths due to accidents while hunting. Farming also means fewer people are required for the same amount of food intake leaving more people free to do other things like develop tools and weapons

    This all snowballs resulting in massive growth that allows the farming group to kill off or absorb any group that doesn't farm.

    Same as natural selection/evolution, random choices/changes occur and the ones that lead to more children are the ones that last 1000s of years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Actually, farming underperformed compared to hunter-gathering, which allowed for more food to be gathered and more leisure time to be spent.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917328/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If I'm going off my own experience and behaviors, I would assume that laziness made it seem like simply planting things would take less effort than hunting down an animal without doing hard calculations on total calories in/out and without imagining what could go wrong with the "lazy" approach.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't think you understand how hard it is to plow a field without draught animals. They didn't have domestic horses or oxen when farming began. It was incredibly hard work vs. just cutting down wild plants and shooting animals with animals or hitting them with spears. And, of course, processing grains by hand before milling was invented was also very hard work. You can't just eat wheat as-is. You have to turn it into flour and cook with it.

    The "lazy" people would be the ones who didn't want to do all of that and instead just walk around the woods until they saw a deer and then shoot it.

    The biggest advantage of agriculture over hunter-gathering is storage during cold or dry seasons when foraged food could be harder to come by, but it is not clear that this was an advantage of farming or the reason for it.

    This isn't even something we have to infer from ancient peoples. There have been studies of modern peoples that show that hunter-gatherers do not work as hard as farmers, and that is with draught animals and other techniques that were developed after the development of agriculture: https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/farmers-have-less-leisure-time-than-hunter-gatherers-study-suggests

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I'm assuming it started small and simple (perhaps just intentionally dropping seeds in a location and hoping for the best) and then problem-solving for higher yields is what led to the great amount of work in the end. It's like how making a weapon can range from simply picking up a stick to refining and material science to mass production methods (to outfit an entire army), all the way up to splitting the atom. There's a wide gulf between wanting to have some extra food growing in a convenient location and wanting to feed an entire village throughout the entire year solely on cultivated food.

  • source
  • parent