this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
106 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8193 readers
177 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've always similarly assumed the number of human clones running around is higher than is known or acknowledged.
Not like, body double shit or anything like that. Just people out in the world who happen to be cloned from someone else. If they could do it with a sheep decades ago, there's no way some obscure billionaire freak hasn't at least tried to bankroll the creation of unregistered human beings for dubious purposes.
Wait until you hear about twins
Cloning has a very high failure rate particularly among large animals. That and humanities long gestation period and slow growth rate make it unlikely. But maybe, I wouldn't put it past them
Babies are technically clones
A clone would still need to be in someone's womb to gestate, so why would it be any less registered than a regular baby? Just fuck people and enslave your own babies at that point, it's an American tradition. If anything clones would just draw more suspicion.