this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
730 points (90.0% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6344 readers
141 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

and no one irl even has the decency to agree with me because it's so fucking drilled into the culture that these fucking BuNsInNesSes have a Right to do this because it's a bSUsniEss. like oh yeah they have an office building so they definitely get to analyze my piss because they say they want to. sick fucking freaks.

preaching to the choir a bit on lemmy (or i would hope so at least) but still

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So what's the alternative? Have employees in an altered state attempting to do their jobs? Recreational drug users love to play the victim because they don't think their use negatively affects anyone, much in the same way a drunk driver thinks they can drive fine while drunk.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

not invade everyone's privacy because you're pretending there's some tremendous concern here. you're playing the victim right now acting like it's dangerous and offensive that a Recreational Drug User in an Altered State could commit the horrible crime of trying to hold down a job despite chemical dependency and people like you trying to make their lives harder at every turn

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oh. So people who operate heavy equipment aren't at risk of causing harm if they're under the influence?

Besides that, I didn't say I agreed with doing it. I asked for an alternative.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have employees in an altered state attempting to do their jobs?

Yes. If you need lab analysis to figure out if they're doing drugs then I'm pretty sure they'll be fine getting their work done.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I imagine the lab analysis is for proof that they're doing drugs. Could you imagine what it might be like without that proof?

Either:

A) you couldn't be fired while operating heavy machinery in an altered state

Or

B) you could be fired without proof of drug use.

Both seem shitty to me.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

You drive better when you've had a couple?