41
submitted 5 days ago by Keld@hexbear.net to c/podcasts@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SickSemper@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago

ok this makes more sense than the discourse on the trueanon sub. does abolish ice fall into the same trap because people say “oh so open borders anybody can come in and nobody will deport them?” or is it different because it’s not a fundamental institution of the state?

[-] MarxMadness@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago

"Abolish ICE" is something I'd stick by. ICE didn't exist before 2002 and it's not as if the country was falling apart. Customs is a reasonable thing to have, but we already have Customs and Border Patrol. There are legitimate reasons you'd want to arrest and deport someone (a decent government might do so for someone wanted on an ICC warrant), but you can have the FBI do that. ICE adds nothing besides the capacity to do deportations at scale, which is a good thing to oppose.

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
41 points (95.6% liked)

podcasts

20312 readers
14 users here now

Podcast recommendations, episode discussions, and struggle sessions about which shows need to be cancelled.

Rest In Power, Michael Brooks.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS