Opposing public education has definitely been a long-term conservative plan, at least since the Civil Rights Act. I don't think there was much going on between Charlie's ears (probably why they aimed for the neck), but I also don't think it's a coincidence that his brand of talking points got amplified.
China is genociding free radicals!
Everyone knows every Command and Conquer battle is won by who's highest on the tech tree, that's it
The easiest answer here is that socialism is not communism. Socialism is often described as a transitory state to communism -- a state controlled by the workers, operating in their interests, and working towards a classless, stateless, moneyless society. You can be a billionaire in China, but billionaires can't grab control of the government.
This is the proper amount of circumspection for posting
The only way Americans can be helped is by being forced to by more enlightened people
This is just defeatist.
We all know about flock cameras
This is a lot newer to libs than you might think. Corporate media has only started reporting on it recently.
how awful it is for you to support them
You cannot affect politics in Iran or Russia
Never said anything like any of this.
How is Russia anti-capitalist? They are anti-imperialist at the moment, which is not the same thing.
when should our support ever be uncritical?
leave the Iranians and Russians to deal with their internal problems.
You can't say all support is critical, then in the next breath say any criticism (of Russia for being capitalist, or Iran for being a theocracy) is impermissible interference in a country's internal affairs.
When something better comes along, I'll support that. Until then, "a guy who calls a genocide a genocide is preferable to a Republican" is a good take.
Iran is a theocracy and Russia is capitalist. They aren't good, they are currently resisting imperialism. Hence why support for them is critical support.
our goal is the fastest possible destruction of the USA
OK, what's your plan for this? Until there's a credible answer to that, there is no reason to attack one of the handful of U.S. politicians who is willing to call a genocide a genocide.