83
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago

Oh right, opening our train network to competition even more is going to fix our broken rail network that suffers from decades of neglect? The very neglect the unions have critized again and again and again?

Right, that sounds totally plausible.

[-] cinoreus@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Privatisation always feels like a solution to shitty government services till some ultra rich company comes in, provides good service while burning cash, capturing the entire market forming a monopoly or duopoly, then raising the prices while making service shittier, and the government will say they can't do anything now because shutting them down would mean paralyzing the entire railway of the country.

If this feels oddly specific, it's because I've seen this happen with my own eyes, just not in the railway.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 21 hours ago

We're just getting to the end of this process with our rail infrastructure in the UK. The companies have spent absolutely no money on maintenance, and now everything's broken, and the only way to fix it is to buy everything back into public ownership, then spend a bunch of taxpayer money.

Trying to run infrastructure projects for profit is a stupid idea. The "profit" is a more dynamic economy facilitated by better transport links. It ain't going to be in the form of cash.

[-] HobbitFoot 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The UK's privitizaton model was crap because it mandated service and only allowed operators to compete on price paid to the UK government, ensuring that all operators were lowest bid and trying to spend the least money on running trains.

Divorcing running trains from maintaining track seems to work better on price since railroads owners are more incentivized to have more trains run on their tracks to gain revenue. However, this system seems to only be tested on rail systems with competent rail operators, which DB is not.

I do think that divorcing owning the tracks and owning the trains is something that should be forced on American rail companies.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, this is the result of neo-capitalist policies; Deutsche Bahn has been partially privatized, which—as is always the case with this logic—means that profits flow into the pockets of billionaires while losses are borne by the general public. That is why, for example, Germany’s internet infrastructure is at the level of a Third World country, even though Telekom generates enormous revenue.

It’s the result of U.S.-style exploitative capitalism, from which we cannot break free because—just as in the U.S.—it has corrupted all the levers of power—but hey, that’s why Germany has so many billionaires compared to other countries.

Edit: That, by the way, is also why the AfD is so strong in Germany. It’s a carbon copy of MAGA and owes its popularity to the same billionaires. This party is anything but an “alternative,” as its name might lead misinformed people to believe: It embodies everything Trump stands for—corruption and unscrupulousness—and that’s putting it quite mildly.

Educate yourselves, read their party platform, and let people know what it stands for. If you don’t want an oligarchy, that’s your civic duty!

[-] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 6 hours ago

Here in Italy internet infrastructure and supply is 100% privatised and I have 2.5gpbs internet at home. I hate privatisation as much as the next lemmy user but that doesn't seem to be the crux of the problem

[-] Aatube@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago
[-] kugel7c@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

It was at one point the phone company arm of deutsche post (the German post office) of which both Telekom and DHL were spun out to be privatised. Both kind of natural monoplies turned private companies which were able to fund large expansions into foreign markets essentially on the backs of German taxpayers and later users of their respective services in their home market.

Holy am I glad that I live in a place where there is a non Telekom ISP well established. Telekom in Germany is a service and troubleshooting hell like you wouldn't belive if you haven't had the pleasure of dealing with them.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
83 points (94.6% liked)

Not The Onion

22169 readers
1382 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS