93
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Sunflier@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

With AI becoming increasingly integrated into “white-collar” industries, raising fears of mass job cuts, there have been calls to bring in a so-called universal basic income, or UBI — which pays people for merely existing.

However, Eberstadt warns that this would only worsen the number of dropouts in American society.

“Disruptive technologies in the past have been really great for people who have had skills,” he said. “Their productivity and incomes have gone up a lot.

“They’ve also displaced a lot of labor for people who don’t have skills. It looks like we’re going to be on that same track with AI, wherever it goes in the next 18 months or 10 years,” Eberstadt said.

“When Henry Ford came down the road, I don’t think that anybody had any idea what a combustion engine was going to do in mass-produced cars,” he said.

"But I would not like to see a guaranteed income, a UBI. Because I look at how men who are neither working nor looking for work say that they are spending their days now. And it is very depressing to see what they say they are doing. And I wouldn’t like us to be buying more of that,” he said.

“They are not engaged in civil society, not helping out around the house, not getting out of the house. Spending 2,000 hours a year in front of a screen. That’s a great warm-up act for becoming a statistic in deaths of despair,” he said.

This is basically a third of our population

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 19 hours ago

“Disruptive technologies in the past have been really great for people who have had skills,” he said. “Their productivity and incomes have gone up a lot.

Ehh.

I mean, I do think that people tend to underestimate their ability to adapt using their existing skillset. And it's certainly the case that if you know, say, statistics, to grab one skill, there are a wide range of fields where you might use that knowledge.

But you can clearly also find examples where that's not the case, where a skillset wasn't very easy to repurpose.

When the horse was phased out as a means of transport, a lot of people had a skillset around dealing with horses, and as demand for horse-related work declined, people need to switch careers, and some of that skillset isn't going to be terribly transferrable. And because there were many jobs with that skillset that were phased out at one time, there will have been a glut of people on the market with that skillset all looking for new jobs. Not much call for even more expertise in dealing with horses when the existing few slots are already allocated to people who really know their stuff.

That said, it might be that there can be interesting perks for society as a whole, even if it's not great for the people who are unemployed. I do remember being frustrated a while back as to why there were so few good technically-sophisticated late Cold War milsim games out of the West. Most of the good stuff came out of ex-Warsaw Pact states. I went digging. Finally found some discussion on it. Basically, when the Cold War ended, Soviet defense spending dropped precipitously. That meant that you had a lot of people with a lot of knowledge about military hardware looking for work (this is also, incidentally, why the US purchased Russian space launch services for some time, to subsidize the industry, because the US didn't want a lot of unemployed people with a skillset in doing things like making ballistic missiles running around on the global job market). But, anyhow, a lot of military simulator video game developers were able to hire really outstanding ex-Warsaw-Pact defense people as consultants for a while, who really knew their stuff. That's a rare situation. I doubt that we'll ever have a period with that level of quality milsim video games again, not short of another breakup of a huge military power. :-/

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

The phasing out of using horses drastically limited the need for horse riders, but it basically killed off horses. Beyond derbies and some shows, they're nowhere. But, where we have no social net and will be left to starve and die in a ditch, at least the now surplus horses were put out of their misery.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

But, where we have no social net and will be left to starve and die in a ditch, at least the now surplus horses were put out of their misery.

Not in a lot of places. The farms went under, and the horses were let loose. Eastern Kentucky has a real problem with wild horses maiming themselves

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
93 points (93.5% liked)

News

38476 readers
2167 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS