131

The term Tankie has a clear definition that Cowbee likes to ignore:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those > who support or defend acts of repression by such regimes, their allies, or deny the > occurrence of the events thereof.

Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the > Lemmy.ml instance! To make this easy you can do an instance block at Settings > Block Tab > Scroll to bottom > Input "lemmy.ml" and apply

And consider donating to individual instances instead.

Check the megathread for more!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rom@hexbear.net 83 points 4 days ago

The term Tankie has a clear definition

lenin-dont-laugh

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 60 points 4 days ago

"how can i be a tankie if i didn't take part in the literal suppression of the hungarian uprising? smuglord"

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 33 points 4 days ago

i'm not old enough to have been a tankie

[-] agentant@hexbear.net 16 points 4 days ago

In the rare occasion both someone makes the Nazi's are members of the NSDAP comment and call me a tankie in the same argument in that order, I know what I must do. fidel-salute

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 55 points 4 days ago

They aren't wrong. The clear definition is "anyone I don't like". I don't know what's so hard about that

[-] axont@hexbear.net 18 points 4 days ago

I'd say it more precisely means anyone who doesn't want to bomb Russia or China

[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 33 points 4 days ago

A reply quoting the meriam Webster definition was posted. It didnt invalidate cowbee at all

[-] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 22 points 4 days ago

No mention of the CIA backed 1954 Hungarian uprising, only vibes

[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 18 points 4 days ago

Wait. It was Wikipedia. Not even a dictionary.

"Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those who support or defend acts of repression by such regimes, their allies, or deny the occurrence of the events thereof."

So, as a pejorative the support or defense of Acts of Repression is so in the opinion of the person using the pejorative. It doesnt say who is being repessed, I want some stuff repressed. This is a piss poor definition because it's far from definite.

[-] Kefla@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago

I mean it's a good definition because it accurately reflects how the word is used. It's the word itself that is silly and indicates the person using it sucks.

[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The definition should point that out, gives a false impression otherwise. The word perceived should be in their

[-] jack@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago

That's implicit in all definitions

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
131 points (97.1% liked)

Slop.

876 readers
355 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS