1267

For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 184 points 1 month ago

Oh look all the "chrome but in a different outfit" browsers are doing the same terrible shit? What a shocker, no one could have predicted that the many many things all on the same base where actuality just fake competition.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 84 points 1 month ago

Firefox has webserial support now. I no longer need anything chromium. Let them rot.

[-] JohnHammerSky@lemmy.today 14 points 1 month ago
[-] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 38 points 1 month ago

Communicating with external devices via USB or the old D-Sub connectors.

Printers, microcontrollers, instruments, etc... Directly instead of through the OS.

Notably, ESPHome Programmer uses it for flashing ESP32s wired. Other companies like Solo Motor Controllers use it for delivering a user GUI to customers that is always updated but that can switch between versions instantly for production without having to having to deal with window's broken method of having to manually search and download .exes for every program.

[-] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 6 points 1 month ago

never heard of it till now. neat!

[-] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I had to use Brave earlier this year to flash firmware onto a Meshtastic device. It's good to hear that Firefox has that option now.

[-] baner@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Even grapheneOS use it for adb into your phone to flash the images.

[-] torlakur@szmer.info 13 points 1 month ago

webserial

they use WebUSB in GrapheneOS

[-] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago
[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

“Coming soon…”

[-] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago

Really? Holy shit I can switch to zen fully at work and at home and uninstall chromium. Webserial was literally the only thing I needed

[-] tomjuggler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I heard about the web usb thing, it's also going to be a game changer for me (I haven't tried yet, hopefully it works)

[-] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 6 points 1 month ago

It does? Guess I can finally yeet Chromium from my machine then.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

They are all chrome with google scratched out and their name written in sharpie in its place.

Of course they are all doing it, cause they are all the same thing.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

They don't even try to pretend to fight it.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

because theres no fighting google.

Microsoft tried, and google won, which is why Edge became a chrome reskin instead of what it was before.

[-] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah, but the worse they are the longer they live apparently.

[-] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Luckily, that's something you can change!

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

To avoid a visit by the FBI, I will say no its not.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Ah an american, in their natural habitat of giving up before even trying. Nothing can ever change, no point, etc. etc.

[-] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

That's just not true. You can always murder a bunch of innocent people or make it more racist. Try understanding a culture before you talk shit next time.

[-] BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

You sound like onna those communists Mr Reagan told me is, like, ten times more scary than people different colours to me.

Don't type! I'm armed!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

The winning move is not to do business with them, don't compete just exist and pretend they don't exist. Microslop played the game and lost, but it is a stupid silly game.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

kinda hard to do when google holds the internet by the balls. and can twist at any moment to get what they want.

Microsoft and Mozilla employees have both accused them of doing this in the past, to sabotage non-chrome browsers on google services, to make chrome look better and drive users to chrome.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 1 month ago

All the FF forks are the same. Soft forks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

God it still pisses me off what they did to my boy Opera. All of us left when they diverted after v12. We all saw this coming.

Then Vivaldi came which I have tried in quite a while but it sucked. Firefox it is.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

I like Vivaldi except for two things: it uses the same engine as Chrome so facilitates Google's stranglehold on web standards, and it is closed-source. For functionality and design it's one of the best, but those are important downsides.

[-] reka@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

What about vivaldi sucked for you?

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Chrome is death to a browser, there is little reason to exist if google gets to make the big calls.

[-] tomjuggler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah opera used to be the one. I'm STILL pissed that they deleted all of my notes

[-] andxz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's a damn shame, I've always liked Vivaldi otherwise. I've been dual running Vivaldi and Firefox for years now, Vivaldi for casual browsing and Firefox for more serious stuff + YouTube.

Oh well, it's time to do a full switch, I guess.

Kinda funny, I've been doing the exact same thing with Win/Linux for approximately the same length of time. Needed Win because of dome software that just doesn't work linux, and sadly, I still do.

Google and Microsoft can go fuck each other with a frozen cactus for all I care.

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

The folks at Vivaldi have been doing some work on their internal ad blocker, I think with the intention to bring most of the functionality of uBo internally so that it doesn't have to be an extension. Not sure how far along they are, but maybe they're intentionally keeping it quiet.

[-] reka@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Vivaldi have earned and deserve a lot of trust here I believe. All my chromium eggs sit in their basket.

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Same here. I'm an Opera refugee so to say (and I had high hopes for Opera actually). I've been using Vivaldi since its first public alpha/preview/whatever they were calling it.

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yup, Vivaldi user for 8 years and it hasn't let me down yet, but this post is troubling news.

[-] andxz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Aye, I'm just not sure how it's going to play out. One can hope, though. It's definitely one of the best options Chrome-wise either way.

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm wondering what the decision making was when they were starting (which is now 10 years ago already, time flies, yo).

From today's perspective, a Firefox fork sounds way more logical. Back then maybe things with Blink/Chromium weren't looking so grim, maybe they were relying on the experience of that part of the team that moved over from Opera...

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

10 years ago Google was trusted and liked. The cracks were starting to show, but we're talking about the Google that was still open sourcing a lot of their products and loudly opposing government censorship of the internet.

[-] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean, on a technical level chromium isn't a terrible browser engine. Building your own engine from scratch is Extremely Hard™ and it's entirely possible to build a decent browser on top of it, so I can understand why most alternative projects have done just that.

It's just... google's control over chromium is concerning.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

And an ecosystem of one engine is not healthy. Even if google was not google, this is a massive risk to take for the Easy™ way.

[-] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's not an ecosystem of one, though one is very dominant.

You can compare it to Linux. It's not the only Unix-like kernel, but it's similarly dominant. If you want to create a new distribution, it doesn't make any sense to spend a decade trying to write your own kernel rather than just using the Linux kernel (insert GNU Hurd jokes here).

Is that an unhealthy ecosystem then? I don't think it is.

What makes the chromium situation unhealthy is Google's ownership and control, not that it's the preferred engine for other browsers. I mean, even a company as large as Microsoft gave up trying to create their own engine.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Your example is a poor choice, Linux overall is one example of an OS for users. There are more OS choices then Linux, that is good. Nothing like web browsers where people where actively trying to make everything chromium based. The ecosystem is unhealthy when there is one choice for an entire type of software (so for OS you have Linux, Windows, and Mac as big players) and outside of Firefox and its forks all web browsers are Chromium based. Oh and although there are other fringe options they don't matter much, much like in the OS world Temple OS is not a real choice.

My point was that it would be very very bad if Firefox was not there (or turned into chromium) as an ecosystem of one is a massive risk regardless of who controls it.

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah its a real surprise. :)

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

Illusion of choice

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
1267 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

86485 readers
2873 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS