339
Pluto is still a planet, just a dwarf one
(thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
339 points (99.4% liked)
History Memes
2597 readers
801 users here now
A place to share history memes!
Rules:
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.
-
No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.
-
Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.
-
Follow all Piefed.social rules.
-
History referenced must be 20+ years old.
-
Avoid posting AI-generated content whenever possible.
Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world
OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:
- !historyruins@piefed.social
- !historyart@piefed.social
- !historyartifacts@piefed.social
- !historyphotos@piefed.social
- !askhistorians@piefed.social
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I like to imagine the alternative world, where instead of deplanetizing Pluto, they planetized all the dwarf planets and planetoids in our system.
The Earth's Moon is about 1.5 times bigger than Pluto.
The earth's moon is an extreme outlier to our knowledge. Thea made our world weird
Is it an outlier because the moon is a pretty big satellite for such a snall planet?
And Titan is 6% bigger than Mercury.
in Asimov's Foundation series, there is (was) a galaxy-spanning human civilization, but Earth was lost and mostly considered mythical. One of the arguments against it actually existing was the absurdity of such a double planet system existing. In the wider galaxy only giant planets had such large satellites.
In his books were they similarly absurdly tiny, rotating in irregular orbits well outside of their class of planets, and inhabiting an entire solar system of similarly sized unremarkable objects?
And the 2006 decimation of planet that made Pluto not a planet explicitly added "must not orbit another object" to stop the moon from being a planet.
If that happened, then school children would no longer be required to learn the names of all of the planets. That's just a practical concern with adding another several dozen planets to the list.
And I think it is worthwhile to make kids learn the names and some basic facts about the 8 planets we have.
Did you ever have to memorize the periodic table? This would be a walk in the park by comparison, at least using the current dwarf planet definition.
It's a grade school vs high school thing though. Also only our AP chem class had to memorize the entire table. Knowing the first 20-40 was sufficient for everyone else.
Probably a teacher-specific things too. I passed AP chem and didn't have to memorize it.
How many could there be?
Officially only 4 trans-Neptunian objects have been recognized as dwarf planets. But here's a paper that proposes another 36 known objects to be dwarf planets.
That's about what the situation was in 2006 as well. A new technology was worked out to make it easier to find these, and once it did a bunch of discoveries came in really fast. The writing was definitely on the wall.
If you include the entire Oort cloud, there could be billions of objects out there.
I think that’s so cool!
I wonder what they’re like (I’m sure the answer is cold and rocky, but still!)
We need more deities!
Haumea is fun. It’s got a weird shape that bulges out, giving it a profile similar to an egg:
According to Plato we can just keep making them up. So I'm down!
My addition is Uupta goddess of warm fires and comforting foods. Put her wherever but I feel she's close to the sun somehow.
I thought dwarf planets still had to be round, and they just lack the "cleared its orbit" requirement (e.g. Ceres in the asteroid belt). That would disqualify any Oort cloud objects except Pluto and Charon as far as I know.
It's true. Dwarf planets do have to be round ("in hydrostatic equilibrium"). That requirement will definitely disqualify many of the hypothetical billions of Oort cloud objects.
Ceres is an official dwarf planet, but I excluded it from my list because I was focusing on trans-Neptunians.
A big reason why the IAU hasn't confirmed most of the 36 is because they want strong evidence of roundness, like a spacecraft flyby with direct imaging. Pluto and Eris are close enough that earth telescopes can just barely resolve some of their shapes.
Finally, Pluto and Charon are too close to be considered in the Oort cloud. Sedna, whose discovery precipitated a lot of this crisis, has been nominated as the very first discovered object in the "inner Oort cloud." Sedna's perihelion is at 76 AU.
Oops, right -- Pluto and Charon are in the Kuiper Belt, not the Oort Cloud. I really shouldn't mix those up.
I thought Haumea, Eris, and Makemake were solidly considered dwarf planets. But we don't have good images of those, do we?
in fact, there are only glowing stars and non-glowing stars :)
what are brown dwarves then?