[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 hours ago

It's not like it's rational, some people's brains are just hard-wired to find them actively pleasurable to look at.
At least that's how it is for me, it's not just a turn-on, it literally just feels good to see a nice pair, to the point that if they perfectly match the variables in my brain it's slightly alarming how close it gets to some sort of eldritch cognitohazard.

But then this applies to almost literally every part of a feminine body, the perfect stomach or neck takes me instantly past the "AWOOOOGA" stage and into drooling vegetable. And all of it on a single person is.. so fundamentally delightful that it actually kinda hurts.

But i'm not sure if this is a universal experience, i get the vibe that i've sorta unlocked this by being sufficiently in-tune with or accepting of my desires. In any case it fucking rocks to the degree that the closest thing i have to religion is "everyone deserves to experience this and be in a relationship with a person who triggers it for them".

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago

Fucking backwards ass shit. You're damn well on the right track: LLMs tend to avoid swearing (it's kinda funda-fucking-mentally at odds with how most companies want them to be used), so i think we should respond by cursing like sailors, especially creative swears with wordplay and shit.

It doesn't guarantee it's not LLM writing but if nothing else it's more entertaining.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago

I assume you realize that saying this implies you consider everything on that list weird, which makes you look like a dick.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago

see this all makes sense if you have, like, 10 accounts. But 100 accounts is just fucking strange

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I'd add on that stuff like this should NOT be the default (unless that is specifically what you advertise your software for, and even then you should give a clear option to disable or change it), because users (even admins using the software for their instance) will generally not configure things much.
What should be done is have it as an opt-in, or prompt the user to pick an option.

If one believes their blocklist/filter is in good faith and beneficial to others and to the world in general, then one shouldn't feel a need to force others to use it, only inform them that it exists.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago

please sir, may i have some tokens before my context window-

Hello, how may i help you?

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago

better yet: we KNOW corporate social media is fucking riddled to the bone with filters, hell people talk about "The Algorithm" (praise be) all the time.

And it's just considered normal. It is how it is. Who cares.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago

"autism didn't exist back in my day! now would you like to look at my model train set?"

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I'd say revesal is not just within reach, it's just a matter of people deciding to do it. We know that just digging a bunch of crescent-shaped pits/ponds is really effective at turning desert into green space, and that's hilariously low-tech.

Add on actually complex interventions and ngl i think it could be reversed within like a hundred years.
I mean imagine if massive desalination plants were built and the water pumped inland, we can do that shit, it's just expensive.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago

calling people "critters" is pretty fucking disgusting

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

i think the most accessible way to understand anarchism is to just think of how villages used to work:
There isn't really a big central authority, people just talk to each other and do what needs doing, if there's a problem you gather everyone and talk about it, and maybe there's a couple people everyone defers their judgement to because they actively trust them until given a reason not to.

A modern household is another example: the police isn't going to arrest you for not putting your toys away; everyone in a household is largely equal and if someone wants someone else to do something they have to convince them in some way, and yet it works fine!

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 hours ago

uhhh, you'd structure it from the ground up? Like we have this right now, co-operatives exist and they work really well.

view more: next ›

Swedneck

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago