they really just drag on and on and on
sounds like the thought emporium?
"oh fuck was it "barbarbar bar barbar" or "barbar barbar bar"???? shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit"
does poo burn particularly well?
i'm curious how many inventions we just passively consider advanced or accidental were in fact people going "this copper stuff is great but it's pretty hard to find, there's green rock all around it so.. let's try melting that? wuhey it worked! Now we have access to way more copper! Hm, wonder if other rocks melt into something neat.."
we literally treat livestock better than this during transport, if only because livestock has value and dealing with nasty stuff is nasty
And that's something i'll never understand about people who are okay with this: it's depraved to treat people like cattle, but to treat them worse goes beyond depravity and into being the very definition of evil. Presumably the perpetrators consider suffering a positive..
i'm sure there has to be a "sprangfelden" somewhere near the dutch-german border
me and the bro platonically raising our kids together
I maintain that the most realistically usable artificial global language would be something inspired by toki pona, but with actual effort put into picking words that are maximally understandable and pronounceable by as many people as possible and is designed to be incredibly difficult to mangle beyond intelligibility.
No even remotely complex rules, nothing fancy whatsoever, just an engineered caveman speech that literally anyone can learn from a pamphlet and reliably use to communicate basic normal things with anyone else. Like the way you end up talking when you just barely know a language and need to communicate "i'm allergic to shellfish, can you guarantee that my food won't have touched any part of an animal with a shell?"
Swedneck
0 post score0 comment score
americans try to come up with a new name challenge