The funny thing is that this is the ONE usecase where LLMs can't themselves make anything worse, because if used sensibly it's basically just a black box that pokes at your software until something breaks, the whole point is to break things!

But of course AI-users can't even fucking handle that, they're so utterly incapable of doing any work themselves that "look at the thing and write down things that go wrong and why it went wrong, and check if it has already been reported before submitting your own report" is too much for them to handle.

It is, because these days it's incredibly easy to find information about you unless you fundamentally change all your habits related to technology.

there's no requirement at all to check edits, but some people like to do so.
I think really the only thing you should avoid is editing large areas in one go, and make sure you include a useful summary of the changes.

It's the difference between chugging with your mouth, and chugging through your nose.
Sure you can probably nose-chug without problems, but i'm not fucking trying it.

This is heresy of the highest order, may your noodles be overcooked and your sauces watery.

"why would you want to do it like that? you're dumb. You should instead be doing completely different thing"

goku was of course created by the flying spaghetti monster, glory to his noodlyness

to me it indicates that they're actually interested in the topic, and not just doing it out of obligation as a job

"best i can do is get you baked"

While this is true, there's still a very consciously visible "style" to these images. It's too obvious for me to call it subconscious.
Like the weird focus, the text on the whiteboard looking like a digital font.. The individual things that are weird are quite easy to point out.

can we please just institute an upper age limit on politicians already? If there's a lower limit on age because young people are "impulsive" and whatnot, how can anyone justify letting 80 year olds hold office?

Amazing that moderate-effort generated images look this good now, and yet i immediately twigged that it's not a real photo.
Lo and behold i look closer and indeed the text is garbled nonsense.

Are they intentionally priming the models to have this weird aura of surreality? Or is it just something inherent to AI-generated images that's somehow really difficult to avoid?