252
submitted 1 week ago by Patnou@lemmy.world to c/til@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 171 points 1 week ago

The existence of the G-spot as a distinct structure has not been proven, nor has the source of female ejaculation.[4][5] Although it has been studied since the 1940s,[2] disagreement persists over its definition and location.[4][6][7] The G-spot may be an extension of the clitoris, which may be the actual cause of vaginal orgasms.[7][8][9] Sexologists and other researchers are concerned that women may consider themselves to be dysfunctional if they do not experience G-spot stimulation, and emphasize that not experiencing it is normal.[5]

The lack of study of women's anatomy is abysmal.

The clitoris wasn't fully anatomically described until 2005.

[-] xkbx@startrek.website 55 points 1 week ago

I always forget this fact because it’s so incredulous. Then I re-learn it every time. I’m not looking forward to Alzheimer's

[-] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 week ago

I carry this factoid with me out of pure rage and spite.

[-] Aeao@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

We also use male dummies in most tests so try not to need your seat belt or ever need cpr if you are a woman

[-] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago

Yep and that's still true to this day

[-] 13igTyme@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago

I remember reading an article a few months ago that they finally made female crash test dummies.

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 8 points 1 week ago
[-] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 3 points 1 week ago

And God shuffled his feet.

The album name has been burned into my brain just like burn-in on an old LCD happens.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I mean, Ellen Reid joined in the late eighties/early nineties...

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago
[-] Aeao@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

People can hesitate because… boobs. And that hesitation can be deadly.

[-] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

It's common enough that The Pitt even had this happen to a patient.

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago
[-] Galapagon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Yes, and it's a great scene.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

No, Brad Pitt.

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

How do dummies with boobs help people concerned about touching unconscious women's chests

[-] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I declined Heimlich practice because my training partner was a particularly large chested female. I was about 23 and her crew leader. She was prob 22.

Nope!

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Why? You don't even touch their boobs or chest?

[-] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It would have been difficult not to in this case. And it was in front of a whole bunch of people. I was young and uncomfortable with it. She was too.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

"Comfort is more important than safety" is a mindset that gets a lot of people killed.

[-] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I assume by helping normalize them into the mental model of "CPR patient" which overrides all other aspects of social propriety. "Don't touch boobs without permission" is a big rule so plenty of people are going to have to manually override it in the decision making if you haven't been desensitized to the fact that some CPR patients have them.

I also suspect that the awkwardness of what to do with them while doing chest compressions is helpful, especially ones big enough to move around as you do them.

[-] funkajunk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Despite all my rage I am still just a clit in a cage

[-] ArchEngel@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well, here's another fun little fact for you to carry around then (that I learned recently and gained mild rage for):

Factoid

Invented claim or trivial fact

A factoid was originally defined to mean a false statement presented as a fact. In colloquial speech, it is often used to mean a true but brief or trivial item of news or information.

  • Wikipedia
[-] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

I think this falls under “a true but brief item of information”

[-] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 week ago

If I remember correctly Sexologist Dr. Lindsey Doe has a story from her time as a student where she was in a lecture where a dude was talking about there being no evidence of a G-Spot, and joking about squirting as a concept being a made up porn gag, and she's sitting in the auditorium being like "but I experience G-Spot orgasms and squirt, like... often" 😅

Now, to be fair to the field at least a little bit, I understand why maybe she didn't want to stand up and shout "I routinely hammer my G-Spot and squirt all over the place" in front of her peers, and even in a clinical environment I could imagine it's not the most orgasm-conducive setting to have a bunch of electrodes and cameras and stuff setup and then to be like "okay, now please show us all what it's like at home. Anytime. We're all ready to watch"

[-] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

Sounds about right. Like confidently claiming that women getting wet isn't a real thing ...

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

My doctor wife said...

[-] toynbee@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

Before I met her, my wife went to an anatomy course in which the teacher apparently said women couldn't have kinks (though I believe the word used was "philia").

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I wonder how many of these teachers telling others that women don't like sex were just in denial about their own dead bedroom at home. "Oh honey, nono, it's not you, it's that women just aren't interested in sex in general! Now go off and earn your paycheck, I need to give some special instructions to the pool boy. You know how particular I am about the state of our pool!"

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

i feel like it's a good default assumption for any "negative" sex-related thing. See also "of course being gay is a choice! I only give in to my depraved urges to throat 15 feet of sailor dick a couple of times per year!"

[-] toynbee@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

This roughly matches my wife's theories.

[-] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Oh clearly! It's just simple science! Philia are stored in the balls. 😉

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That tracks deeply with my understanding of the history of kinky women's community and culture.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

"but I experience G-Spot orgasms and squirt, like... often"

What a braggart.

[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago
[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 19 points 1 week ago

That's because 99% of it is inside the body, surrounding the vaginal area. I'm surprised at the wiki stating it "might" be the source of vaginal orgasms. It's a huge mass of nerves around the area... yeah, it might be what's doing it.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago

studies find tongue may be responsible for sense of taste, the results are however questioned by british scientists

[-] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago

Speak for yourself ;)

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago
[-] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Lmfao is the clitoris thing real? MFS really first found the clit 20 years ago

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately there surrounds a whole lot of stigma around studying the female sex of humans. We know more about how one of horses or cows function, because if someone is seeking funding to study the human female sex there is an immediate opinion you're just a perv.

I read a few interviews about this quite a while ago, I'll try to find them...

[-] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

These days it's considered DEI and just gets defunded.

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

So, basically, a lose-lose situation.

[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

https://open.substack.com/pub/saraszalmd/p/the-female-body-was-not-designed

Heterosexual men report orgasm during partnered sex 95 percent of the time. Heterosexual women: 65 percent. Lesbian women: 86 percent, a rate comparable to heterosexual men. A 2024 scoping review of the full body of evidence concluded that the orgasm gap is largely driven by social dynamics rather than biological mechanisms.

[-] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

A 2024 scoping review of the full body of evidence concluded that the orgasm gap is largely driven by social dynamics rather than biological mechanisms.

I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you! /s

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

All the bi women I've been with must have been deeply invested in this research as they were telling me these findings years before publication

[-] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

I feel seen hahaha

this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
252 points (95.7% liked)

Today I Learned

30163 readers
826 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS