321
He's at it again.
(thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
321 points (99.1% liked)
Political Memes
11807 readers
1842 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The quality of sperm and the volume declines with age.
This is well known, and would have taken him two seconds to find a study on nih.gov about this. Not that it matters, since he's operating by "feel" instead of fact.
Is he saying old men? I read it as teens today have less than men in the 1970's.
https://people.com/rfk-jr-says-men-in-the-70s-had-twice-as-much-sperm-as-teenage-boys-today-existential-crisis-11972098
"men in the '70s" = men in the 1970s, not "men in their 70s"
Just clarifying. I think he's an idiot.
My bad, I shouldn't have commented before fully waking up :)
Not to give him too much credit, but it sounds like that's what he's trying to say. Men in the 70's, who reasonably should have lower production than teenagers, have more when compared to the teens of today.
It seems to be that he is talking about it in the worst way possible, considering his reputation I'm not surprised. It just a situation which undermines the factual evidence.