127
rule (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Just reposting this excellent point from lemmygrad

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I don't want to pull the "I'm a statistics professor card", but I'm literally a statistics professor so unless I see an integral over a sample space in the denominator I don't want to hear about likelihood, and especially not when someone's half-baked narrative of possible possibilities gets treated as meaningfully bearing on that likelihood.

Like are we just throwing that word around or is their some objective method that apparently everyone else knows about for now to compute these probabilities and arrive at these conclusions.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Yeah it's called guesstimating janet-wink

There's no way to objectively calculate the worth of an innocent person's life anyway, so you can't really put it into a formal equation. Sometimes you just have to make decisions based on incomplete information, I don't see what the problem is. It's not like I want to kill kids, but if I evaluated that there's a high enough chance that it could save a high enough number of lives, I'd pull the lever on that trolley problem 100%. What am I, a Kantian?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If seems to me that if we're willing to acknowledge that our subjective estimation of probabilities aren't necessarily any good at predicting actual outcomes we could not only save ourselves a ton of trouble handwringing over what level of perceived benefit justifies turning on the orphan mulcher, it would also go a long way to ensuring we don't accidentally make common cause with the people who do enjoy mulching orphans.

You can pretty easily draw a thoughline from the slapdash deployment of political violence to the elevation of ghouls like Beria to the head of the organs of state.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I just wanted to say thank you for arguing against the celebration of the murder of children. heart-sickle

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
127 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13924 readers
745 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS