Taylor Swift files to trademark her voice and likeness in era of AI deepfakes (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 1 week ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/music@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago

I think it would be ideal for everyone to have copyright privileges on their name and likeness (visual, audio, biometric, probably other things I'm forgetting) by default. If you want to work with a publishing label or w/e and grant them a limited license to reproduce your likeness, fine. But it should be protected from public use without explicit authorization without regular folks having to do anything.

[-] zout@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

That would work for ten minutes before some company has in their EULA that by agreeing, you hand over the copyright.

[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

To be specific, I’m talking about trademark and not copyright. If someone uses AI to generate a video of you doing something, no copyright exists because AI content can’t be copy written. You wouldn’t have any recourse to get that video taken down unless you had a trademark on your own likeness.