67
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
67 points (94.7% liked)
Music
11571 readers
326 users here now
Per community feedback, low-effort GenAI posts are disallowed.
↳ Our family Communities:
➰#Music
Music.world - !music@lemmy.world
Jazz -!jazz@lemmy.world
Album Art Porn - !albumartporn@lemmy.world
Fake Album Covers - !fakealbumcovers@lemm.ee
Obscure Music - !ObscureMusic@lemm.ee
Vinyl and LP's - !vinyl@lemmy.world
Electronic Dance Music - !edm@reddthat.com
60's Music - !60smusic@lemmy.world
70's Music - !70smusic@lemmy.world
80's Music - !80smusic@lemmy.world
90's Music - !90smusic@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Protection from AI copying you shouldn’t just be available to the rich via trademark law
I think it would be ideal for everyone to have copyright privileges on their name and likeness (visual, audio, biometric, probably other things I'm forgetting) by default. If you want to work with a publishing label or w/e and grant them a limited license to reproduce your likeness, fine. But it should be protected from public use without explicit authorization without regular folks having to do anything.
To be specific, I’m talking about trademark and not copyright. If someone uses AI to generate a video of you doing something, no copyright exists because AI content can’t be copy written. You wouldn’t have any recourse to get that video taken down unless you had a trademark on your own likeness.
That would work for ten minutes before some company has in their EULA that by agreeing, you hand over the copyright.