332
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 months ago

You’re way quicker manually reviewing code compared to setting up everything just so that an LLM agent could do that. Additionally, it is open source. Literally nothing gives you any guarantees that the software will work in the first place. If you are scared of that, commercial products are your choice.

[-] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You’re way quicker manually reviewing code compared to setting up everything just so that an LLM agent could do that.

Not only that, you're better off reviewing the code manually so you understand how everything works.

If you understand how things work, you can plan things out.

If you don't, you'll end up painting yourself into a corner.

If you are scared of that, commercial products are your choice.

Commercial products are not a panacea for bad software quality.

Code openness and code quality are independent, orthogonal axes.

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
332 points (91.9% liked)

Fuck AI

7012 readers
1297 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS