zr0

joined 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

What’s up, buddy? Why the sudden silence? Or did you finally realize that “Signal security failure” was never something someone said and it was actually just something the author came up with?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

If it is your first Souls-like game, then yes. Otherwise no.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

That’s right. It is just unnecessary to mention Signal at all in this case, as it might cause confusion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

All good. It’s just an unnecessary punch against Signal. Especially journalist rely heavily on it, so I don’t know what the intention was with this title.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And where exactly do you see “Signal security failure” in the quoted text?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Sure sure. Oh. About the quotes. Do you mind sharing a screenshot of the quotes you are talking about?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Tell me you are dense, without telling me you are dense. You can’t make this shit up 🤣

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Both are issues. One could introduce leaks because of technical issues. The other one introduced leaks because of humans.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (9 children)

There are no quotes. So it is not something Trump said. It was interpreted by the author of the news story.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Have my upvote. Because my view is the same. The title included a quote, which is even marked as a quote. However, “Signal security failure” is without quotes. So the author just chose to unnecessarily blame Signal, instead of the real issue.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can someone explain, what we see here? I am very curious to know more about it.

view more: next ›