813
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
813 points (95.2% liked)
Fuck AI
6177 readers
2850 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Which entry-level Linux distribution do you recommend?
Linux Mint, for sure.
Mint, or possibly bazzite if you're a gamer, because that's the Linux distro Gamers Nexus picked to test performance on.
Or, valves steam os should have a fleshed out PC version very soon.
Bazzite is great as well! Though I will admit I have had trouble installing it on old hardware. A few ddr3 systems with 2.5" ssds, mostly. It works wonderfully on anything from the past 5 to 10 years though.
And you wouldn't think there were that many ddr3 systems around anymore. But there are surprisingly quite a few. Intels 4790k is still pretty useful even today, and you can get 16 - 32gb of ram in these old systems. For those who just want to play decent games from 10 - 15 years ago, or lightweight indie titles like stardew valley or factorio, a cheap ddr3 build is perfectly fine. Especially given the prices of modern hardware. For those systems, CachyOS has always worked.
However. Mint installs on just about anything. I've even installed it on a Dell Optiplex 780 from 2011! It's so little fuss to install and use so I always recommend it to new users.
Steam os isn't that great as a daily driver IMO. It's really more focused on the gaming part, and tbh, mint + steam autostart in big picture mode is better at its job.
Might just be my preferences.
Like I said, valve hasn't released the PC version of steam OS, yet. So that makes it kind of hard to criticize. Using it on my steam deck seems like it would be just fine as a simple Linux desktop. It all navigates and works. There's just nothing flashy about it. Dunno what all you do with your desktop. I just need mine to navigate around and run programs.
Don't overthink it. Try something out, worst case you can just swap it if you don't like it. All the "beginner" distributions are perfectly good and almost interchangeable.
If you've got a geeky power user strain in you, try Pop_OS! with their new COSMIC desktop. The blend of traditional window manager and tiling is an absolute delight. But if you're just trying to stay in your comfort zone as you explore the unfamiliar waters of Linux, I heartily recommend Linux Mint.
I've installed Mint on my own gaming desktop, and it's invariably what I install for customers who can't afford a PC upgrade to deal with Microslop's Windows 11 bullshit. They all do fine on it, no one even appreciates the difference from Windows except that they all recognize their old hardware is suddenly much snappier than it was. And as for Pop_OS! COSMIC, I'm running that on the laptop from which I'm typing this comment now. I like them both, but Linux Mint is definitely more battle-tested.
Ubuntu's GNOME layout isn't really for me, but if you're looking for something that's...I don't know, a little Mac-ier than Windows-y, then Ubuntu isn't a bad way to go. I tried Kubuntu (that's Ubuntu with KDE instead of GNOME) recently and I had a lot of trouble with it for some reason so I just fell back on Linux Mint (which is how it became my desktop computer's OS).
Don't over-think it. The joy of live ISOs is that you can put them on USB disks and try various interfaces out. At the end of the day though, it's like human DNA...99% the same product under the hood, and you can typically change things around after the fact.
Actually, I have a good example of that: I put Linux Mint XFCE on my grandma's machine because it was especially under-powered. XFCE is just about the lightestweight traditional desktop environment around. I was worried Linux Mint's typical Cinnamon environment might be a little heavier and therefore leaving some performance on the table. Well, I spent hours trying to troubleshoot why I couldn't use RustDesk to remotely connect to her computer for support, and it finally occurred to me that XFCE might be the problem. I didn't have to reinstall the entire OS! I just installed the Cinnamon package (one single line of a command in the terminal), then I logged out, chose Cinnamon on the login screen, logged back in under this different desktop environment, and was able to use RustDesk successfully! No fuss, no muss. I'm not going to say you won't have occasional headaches with Linux but you tell me what comparable options I have when Windows 11's heavy fucker of an interface with a taskbar I can't move around the screen is ruining my day, or macOS replaces a tried and true GUI aesthetic with a batshit broken liquid glass one? I certainly can't swap in the older GUIs I liked, but in Linux, it's totally an option, like changing the exhaust on a car or whatever.
Have fun :)
Nobody is asking you what hardware you're running or your use case...
If your computer is a couple years old and you're doing general web browsing, then I would recommend Kubuntu 24.04, latest version of Linux Mint, or Debian.
If your computer is newer, as in a year old or so, I would recommend Kubuntu 25.10, latest version of Fedora(KDE/Plasma spin), or possibly CachyOS(Arch based).
If you're a gamer, then same as above, Kubuntu 25.10, Fedora, or CachyOS, but I would highly recommend CachyOS in this instance.
The main things to consider for Linux is the version of the Kernel you may need and what Desktop Environment(Gnome, Plasma, Cinnamon, etc) you prefer.
The Linux Kernel is where most drivers will come from and are baked in. You can install proprietary drivers, but that process can vary depending on the distro.
The Desktop Environment is what you'll be interacting with on a daily basis. Personally I prefer and highly recommend Plasma. It has great Wayland support(newer way to render and manage programs graphically) and customization is there if you need it. You CAN install multiple Desktop Environments at the same time and you're not stuck with whatever is the default. But again, I'd recommend Plasma.
Now, why CachyOS? Simply because it has a lot of quality of life aspects available. It's not a "gaming" distro, but it can be right out of the box. It's built for speed, but also convenience in my opinion. Cachy can automatically detect and install the latest Nvidia drivers during the initial install. The "gaming" packages are a single click in their "CachyOS Hello" window on startup. And if you choose GRUB or Limine for your bootloader and BTRFS for your filesystem, you'll have snapshots for recovery automatically setup for you(which saved my butt twice now).
Definitely try out a few distros. Personally I started with Mint and loved it, but I ran into driver issues eventually due to how they do kernel releases. Then tried Ubuntu, Fedora, Manjaro, Endeavor, Debian...all of these never "kept" me because of something breaking or lack of timely driver updates. But I'm on CachyOS now and within a month of trying it I ended up switching all of my Windows machines to it, which I've never done before. I've never gone "full Linux" before, but Cachy pulled me right in. I've thrown it on multiple laptops, a NUC, and a desktop gaming PC and it's "just worked" on all of them.
IMO, Arch (which CachyOS is based on) is decidedly not an entry-level distro. Might be the smaller evil if you're doing lots of gaming, though.
I totally understand and I do hate recommending Arch right from the start, but CachyOS is a great entry level Arch distro. The installer is pretty straight forward and setup is very minimal if you're just going to game. The only thing lacking IMO, for beginners, is an "app store" with pretty pictures.
But if you're gaming, I think you should be on the latest kernel possible, so a rolling release(Fedora) or bleeding edge(Arch). Latest Ubuntu derivative(25.10, soon 26.04) is fine but not ideal. It's the main reason SteamOS is also based on Arch.
Again, not gaming? Mint is probably the defacto unless you're on newer hardware.
It's pretty much exclusively about the update process for me. With fixed-release distros, you typically only have to actually pay attention, read news posts etc. before updating to a new major version, which in case of Ubuntu LTS happens every 2 years, which is a lot fewer opportunities to fuck up than Arch's rolling release. Not insurmountable if you're something of a power user or willing to put in the work to learn, but hardly the first choice for someone asking for an entry-level distro.
Ubuntu's HWE kernel is just fine, even for LTS users. The only time it might not be enough is if you buy bleeding edge hardware. IME, the actual issue with Ubuntu for gaming is that sometimes you'll need newer mesa packages, which needs to be acquired separately from the kernel, usually via PPA. If you're playing newly-released AAA games, that does come up occasionally. e.g. I started using a mesa PPA when I got Elden Ring. Though I'm not sure if even that is necessary if you use the 6-monthly Ubuntu releases.
So yeah, if you're that kind of gamer, Arch probably is a cleaner or at least equivalent solution than Ubuntu.
I think if someone is a power user of Windows already then they can adapt to CachyOS as a new user. I'd recommend it to those people because I was that guy lol. The difficulty is...updating! Not using the OS. What does that mean actually for new people looking in?
You read:
https://archlinux.org/news/
https://discuss.cachyos.org/c/announcements/5
Before updating. Every time. Which you do pretty often. That's the point of rolling release. Sometimes you have to manually intervene, usually updating is uneventful. Let's look at CachyOS January 2026 announcement for an example of eventful:
CachyOS says:
Manual changes for existing users:
KDE Plasma users with SDDM can now migrate to Plasma-Login-Manager. Please run:
outside of this the usual:
What else is difficult? .pacnew files. What are those? Config file changes, basically. Pacman the package manager doesn't deal with config files. You have your old file and the .pacnew file. You manually merge them. Install meld, it highlights the differences and provides arrows to move the changes easily into your existing config file of whatever got updated. How often? Not very. I've done it...under 15 times in a full year I think?
Now, I think a Windows power user can handle this. Someone scared of folder structures and doesn't read error messages? No.
Fedora
Mint and some Ubuntu flavor such as Kubuntu. These two have the biggest userbase and thus problemsolving via internet search aswell as lots of deb packets come in handy.
Also they are out of the box experience straight from the start and everything just works.
https://distrosea.com/
You can give it a test drive, given peoples suggestions. The most common desktop environment are Gnome and KDE, and I think they tend to have the least issues with stability, screen tearing, scaling, and fps, since they're the most actively developed.
I just started using Linux, but Bazzite has been treating me well. If you are primarily using your PC for gaming, that might be the way to go.
They also recently got their team reinforced, so I am hoping that carries them much farther in the future. https://www.xda-developers.com/bazzite-reveals-the-open-gaming-collective-to-make-gaming-on-linux-even-better/
ZorinOS seems like a decent choice.
If you don’t need lots of up-to-date gaming support, Mint. The newest games and hardware are more likely to have issues than older. If you’re looking for something approachable and built specifically for gaming, Bazzite. If Bazzite is a bit too strong on the gamer feel and you want something a bit more toned down, I personally use EndeavourOS.
Ubuntu or anything Ubuntu-based should be smooth sailing. e.g. Linux Mint treated me well when I switched from Windows 7, and I'm still using a heavily modified Ubuntu to this day.
Ubuntu is definitely the best entry-level user-friendly Linux distro to start with, the latest installation process is so simple.
As others have already recommended, Linux Mint. Although I had trouble getting my two monitor set up to work, I couldn't set the Scale for each monitor individually). Or Bazzite, which worked right out of the box for me
Mint.
When I started 3 years ago I was distrohopping almost every week... For gaming on Nvidia+Intel combo - arch Linux distros with kde is where I found peace... Started with endeavouros and now I use cachyos with kde plasma. Both are quite good. I have installed limine+ Snapper and this does system snapshot on each update. Never needed it though and every time I am updating irresponsibly. Gl, install any Linux.
One of us!
For the distribution (distro), Ubuntu. There's a chance that you experienced this distro growing up at your school or local library.
For the desktop environment (DE), GNOME is most like Apple OSes, while Cinnamon and KDE Plasma are most like Windows 10.
Cinnamon tends to go better with the Mint distro though, and GNOME is the default DE for Ubuntu. I use KDE Plasma with Ubuntu (Kubuntu) personally and I've enjoyed it.
I am entry level and mint is so far being nice with me, just that my pc is old so it kinda lags
Ubuntu based for sure like Linux Mint, ZorinOS or PopOS
but I wouldn't recomnend Ubuntu for their Snap
I'm not a fan of snap, either, but is it actually an issue for entry-level users?
PopOS
No!
PopOS switched to Cosmic which only just came out.
Recommend PopOS to users with experience, who know how to fix/avoid problems.
But, hold off from recommending PopOS for beginners until around the 27.10 release when most of the papercuts are sanded over.
Something modern and immutable (so its harder to break) like KDE-Linux. Otherwise, something like Bazzite which is good for gaming. If you want low resource and flatpak (its the future) built in, ZorinOS.