127
But at what cost?
(thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
127 points (96.4% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14264 readers
712 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
As far as I can tell, this is policy. At least in that the death penalty is officially an option. CW for the obvious. Note machine translation. Also worth noting that this doesn't seem to be new, looks to me like it's been on the books since 1997.
Hidden
Can someone see if i found gommunist propaganda? I read on XHS that if you get married and then your partner rps you, it will not be treated as a rp case. It will be legally just be listed as domestic violence. There's a few US states that also do not countremoved asremoved if youre married to yourremoved.
I'm really hoping it's misinformation.
It is not misinformation per se. There is no legislation in regards to marital sexual violence in the PRC. As such, it is inconsistent whether or not sexual violence within the marriage will be considered sexual violence within the courts.
However, the Datong assault case (2023) was elevated into the Supreme Court repository last year (meaning the higher courts determined it had value as case precedent for courts in all jurisdictions). The Datong case established that engagement did not constitute consent. This is a step closer to marital sexual violence laws (engagement, once formalized via the exchange of a bride price, is in many traditions often considered a more-or-less finalization of the conferral of marital privilege), but there is as yet no legislation explicitly outlining the rights of spouses to boundaries of consent, just a series of disjointed and inconsistent case law (for instance couples who are separated and undergoing divorce tend to have the sexual violence recognized as sexual violence), none of which has been elevated by the Supreme Court.
The institution of marriage as an exchange of property and the conferral of marital privilege is one that has only recently begun to be challenged in most of the world. Even countries that have laws barring marital sexual violence struggle to have marital sexual violence recognized as such before the courts (which is not surprising, considering how most sexual violence is barely recognized as such regardless of the relationship between those involved), and many countries either do not have legislation that covers it, or even worse, have legislation that explicitly exempts it from being classified as sexual violence.
Interestingly, this violence was once talked about in depth by Soviet scholars who were working to eradicate the institution of bourgeois marriage and develop new forms of family and relationship dynamics in the early USSR (way ahead of the game compared to most every other country on earth at the time), before a return to traditional values re-established the push for heteronormative marriages with an emphasis on the need to reproduce. In fact, the first country to criminalize marital sexual violence was the USSR (1922). It wasn't until the 70s that other countries started following suit (beginning with Germany and then spreading through Europe)
I don't mean to overload this with too much info on a very depressing subject, this is just a topic that I specialize in as an educator. A report by WHO found that one in three women worldwide experience marital sexual violence. It is sadly, a deeply prevalent social phenomenon, baked into the history of what marriage represents (the conferral of privilege as a property exchange)
You know, the US may have different laws for different states. But when I think about it, the US is one nation that has this same problem I worried China has. So between China and the US having this similar legal issue, it really is global progress that China is making the depicted law a legal possibility.
Emphasis on the word "possibility" because its important that it's not an automatic guarantee. As others mentioned, guaranteed death comes with it's own problem of a possible permanent mistake, or further traumatized victim(like Maya Angelou) who wanted to report but didn't want their attacker dead.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Thanks for this. I was having a lot of trouble making sense of anything via baidu and machine translation.
There is I believe a domestic violence law since 2016 that should cover it, but it is inconsistently enforced, especially in Rural areas.
Yes, it is largely covered as domestic violence, but there is no specific legislation that defines it as sexual violence. That doesn't mean it can't be considered sexual violence, it's just not explicitly defined and so it isn't consistently applied. Divorcing/separated couples get a bit more application of sexual violence laws, as it is more likely to be seen that marital privilege has been revoked. This is even considering that anyone attempts to go through the courts with this, which the overwhelming majority of survivors do not (either because they are entrenched in the system of accepting this violence as a marital privilege, or because they are afraid of retraumatization through the courts when there is a likelihood that it won't even result in any real recognition of what they experienced). There is a huge amount of stigma (especially in more rural areas, though this stigma exists everywhere) around being a survivor of any sexual violence, and that stigma is much higher in marital cases, where regardless of court outcomes community/social impacts can be severe.