218
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works to c/news@lemmy.world

A new tranche of documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein revealed several communications with William J Burns, a career diplomat who would go on to become the central intelligence director under Joe Biden.

The documents describe the planning for meetings between Burns and Epstein, two of which occurred, and show Epstein texting with Burns and recommending that other people in his orbit meet with him. The meetings and correspondence occurred after Epstein had pleaded guilty to prostitution-related charges in Florida in 2008, including solicitation of prostitution with a minor under the age of 18.

A spokesperson for Burns told the Guardian that the two men had “no relationship”, and that Burns “did not know anything about him, other than that he was introduced as an expert in the financial services sector”. The spokesperson said Burns “deeply regrets ever meeting with him”. Burns has never been accused of any wrongdoing related to Epstein’s crimes.

Burns has decades of diplomatic experience under both Republican and Democratic administrations. During his confirmation hearing to become CIA director in 2021, even Trump-partisan senator Lindsey Graham called him an “outstanding choice”.

The first mention of Burns in the Epstein files is dated April 2013, when Epstein emailed an associate, Terje Rød-Larsen, a former Norwegian diplomat, about a meeting: “lets set a meeimg [sic] with Bill burns in wash or ny.” There is no context in the email, or even a subject heading. Rød-Larsen resigned as head of the International Peace Institute in 2020, after revelations that he secured donations from foundations related to Epstein, as well as a personal loan from the financier. He could not be reached for comment.

The following month there was an actual meeting.

Epstein’s assistant emailed the financier on 19 August: “Bill Burns is in a meeting now ... his assistant will have him call you once he is out of the meeting.” Burns finally met with Epstein on 21 August at the DC law office of Steptoe, a white-shoe firm, for lunch, as the Wall Street Journal first reported in a story in 2023 about Epstein’s calendar.

Epstein, then a convicted sex offender, had gone to the US Treasury that morning, according to his calendar. There is no hint why. Then at noon that day, he met with Burns.

Burns’s spokesperson said that the subject matter concerned Burns’s efforts for his career post-government. Ten days later, on 1 September, Epstein started to text Burns, following up.

“Bill,” wrote Epstein, “Peter thiel will be with me 13,14 in ny . I think it would be nice for you to meet if convenient for you . There is an apt for you to use if you choose.”

The last time Burns’s name appears in the files is 27 March 2018, in the midst of a multiday text chain between Epstein and former Trump strategist Steve Bannon. Apparently out of the blue, Epstein said: “I suggest you meet Bill Burns.” Burns’s spokesperson said a meeting with Bannon “did not happen”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dgdft@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Why do we pretend like it’s necessary to have a CIA as part of the U.S. government? Between the nepotism and complete lack of public accountability they justify by claiming it’s necessary to “protect America,” they might as well just be a private corporation.

It really seems like the entire purpose of the agency is just to help rich people in the U.S. do fucked up shit at home and around the globe to destroy democracy in the name of “spreading democracy.”

There’s a book I love called The Very Best Men by Evan Thomas that shares this thesis. The author is a well-regarded Washington journalist and insider who was given access to the CIA’s archives.

He starts off by playing the title straight, humanizing his main subjects, explaining their ideological motives and justifications, and playing up their esteemed credentials and education. Then he goes into the practical effects of their actions and shows that in practice, they were terrible people who pumped out a steady stream of incompetent gaffes, own-goals, and international crimes.

There’s a very similar vibe to the Epstein files: The shadowy kabbalic figures were, in the cold light of day, grade A morons and it’s a miracle they had any success covering their tracks at all.

this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
218 points (100.0% liked)

News

35471 readers
2718 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS