824
Be America (thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone 38 points 4 days ago

I don't think it's a lack of willingness, but rather a lack of ability. Militant action requires a lot more than simply owning a gun.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 31 points 4 days ago

Heretic!

If those gun toting hicks could read. They'd be very upset.

It's almost as if some form of militia, possibly a well regulated one, would also be necessary.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"Well regulated" in the 1700s sense or "well regulated" in the "I think the government should have direct control over the militia that is supposed to violently fight the government" sense? Because imo one seems more viable than the other.

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago

The second amendment was never intended to let the people overthrow the government. It was intended to serve instead of a standing army for the defense of the republic. Madison didn’t want military power centralized in the Federal government.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

Ehhh the federalist papers make it pretty clear that the second amendment and the aforementioned militias were for threats both foreign and domestic. Plus, considering the whole "starting a revolution against what was at the time 'their own' country" thing alone I think they recognized the possibility that they may need to do it again in the future.

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" and all that.

-Thomas Jefferson

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Not only did he not want it centralized, it was really uncommon and expensive to have a standing professional army at the time. The US was a new nation, and it was pretty poor. The idea they'd be able to have a federal professional military, at least one large enough that you don't need supplemental militias, would probably be laughed at.

[-] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 4 days ago

most people who care are also intelligent enough to realize that just opening fire is a losing move

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

They also understand OPSEC. Can't carry out orders if the energy knows what you are planning

So many people expecting large formations of armed Americans to just storm the capital, talk about brain washed by Hollywood. We're the French, Dutch, etc. Resistance baby!

[-] lividweasel@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

The American people missed out on a golden opportunity to do something really funny about a month ago…

[-] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

You know what we missed out on? a chance to assassinate Putin when he visited Alaska last year to get some head from El Taco.

[-] Goodeye8@piefed.social 11 points 4 days ago

I imagine ICE would be less openly hostile when there would be a legitimate risk of getting shot by a vigilante.

Not saying it justifies having the amount of guns Americans have, but since they already have them they should be used for the reason they have them, to oppose a tyrannical government.

[-] theolodis@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago

What are the guns for then? I thought the second amendment was to fight the government? But now you're saying being armed is not enough?

Why even let people arm themselves, if all they do with the weapons is school shootings?

[-] Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

I'm saying you need training and organizing in addition to the guns.

And to answer your last point, personally I'd be more in favour of citizen's weapons depots rather than privately owned guns for the murder/suicide reasons you mention.

[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

It was a powerful lie to convince most gun owners that a "right to a well-regulated militia" meant being able to individually own a gun and never be trained to use it or organize.

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
824 points (97.8% liked)

Political Memes

10945 readers
2924 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS