252
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 78 points 2 years ago

Even if you steel man his argument and presume his 100% innocence, he still did something wrong by traveling to a place he didn't live to act belligerent to locals with his gun. It is impossible for you to argue that he did nothing wrong. Try harder.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

That logic applies extra to the rioters

[-] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Telling that you take offense to that...

[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago

It's telling that you defend fash murderers

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Hey, we don't know it's tiny. We know it's a shitty dick because it's attached to a shithead, no arguments there. But saying that this reactionary asshole has a tiny dick and should be ashamed of that fact is rather body shamey and just hurts comrades who may be insecure about their small dicks.

It's not the size of the dick that's the problem, it's the personality of the asshole the dick is attached to, you know?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Completely great point! I didn't intend for "tiny" to be negative, but I can see how it inherently is, when I use the descriptor to be antagonistic

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (90 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
252 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13925 readers
633 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS