266
GenAI is a fraud and it needs to start being treated like a fraud.
(friendica.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
266 points (95.9% liked)
Fuck AI
5688 readers
2532 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
No. Not only is that not a Ponzi scheme, that's not how genai works neither.
You can get new investments to improve how existing investments make money. That's how all businesses work. The fraud is when you get investments to pretend old ones are making money.
'augment data' is a meaningless phrase. It's like saying you augment plain rice by adding more plain rice to it.
Genai doesn't consume data the way taking investments consumes money. At no point is the data destroyed, they can keep generating without any new training data being needed. And it doesn't lure in new data by promising to return it with interest, it either steals it or pays for it with money.
You could say the money investments into the genai companies is like a Ponzi scheme, and that's the nature of an investment bubble. It has nothing to do with how genai works.
strongly disagree. like all great ponzi schemes, it's built on theft. they just think they can get away with the theft until it makes such ridiculous profits no one will care. Like the vast majority of ponzi schemes, the idiots running them think they'll actually get away with the riches.
llms, or 'genai' if you want something more sexy sounding than overclocked chat bots, are entirely reliant on growing training data and absolutely rely on more coming in every day. It's literally reshaping the nature of web traffic.
The point here isn't that genai is ethical: the point is that Ponzi schemes are a very specific kind of crime which doesn't really map to genai.
Let's assume that all genai is theft. That still wouldn't make it a Ponzi scheme. Ponzi schemes are, very specifically, when an investment company sends money to new investors from their old investments while lying and claiming it's from profit from the new investment, in order to keep new investors coming in.
The specific crime that all genai companies are very clearly and obviously guilty of is copyright infringement. Making the internet worse is unfortunately not a crime.
hear me out: the scheme is the circular flow of funding between nvidia, openai, and the data centers that will do the computational grunt. they think 'if we simply obfuscate where the billions and billions and billions of dollars land, no one will care!'
when 90% of those profits will land at nvidia and go no where else.
I like that you trying to hold AI companies accountable for the garbage they are trying to pull.
I don't think that it is theft as stealing would deprive the owner of their property. Copying ones and zeroes is not theft. Perhaps you could argue copyright infringement, but that is a civil issue between corporations.
somehow I missed you going whole hog on corporate schlong there. goddamn man, of course you're quibbling about it being theft if you believe that nonsense
I don't think you understand how distasteful artificial scarcity is. The underpinnings of Intectual Property are ridiculous. If you think I am going to believe anything is being stolen you are literally barking up the wrong tree.
Speaking of sucking on corporate schlong, that is literally what those who support copyright do for fun.
sure thing sloperator. enjoy your ai girlfriend.
I can't hear what you say with corporate cock in your mouth.
you're the idiot defending AI numbnuts
Reading comprehension must be hard for you. I am sorry to hear you are unable to understand my points, have you tried sucking a bag of dicks?
your own fucking words moron. except it's intellectual property, learn to spell.
you think theft from genuine humans, actual artists is fine, you're supporting stealing from creators, you're a fucking chode
most likely because you don't possess an ounce of skill or sense in that empty head. so you're down to steal it from actual creators.
First of all, it is not theft. You can't just make up what words mean. This is exactly the bullshit argument corporate lawyers use to push their lies about copyright infringement.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy_is_theft
Why are you using industry lies? As I said, there are plenty of reasons to hate AI. This is just not one of them.
Second, all art, science, and culture is iterative. As a singer, player of musical instruments, digital artist, coder, and writer of stories I have created a lot in my lifetime. I probably have more creativity in my pinky than you do in your whole body.
I have heavily borrowed from our culture for the songs I sing, the art I create, and the words I write. You cannot create art in a vacuum. All artists build off each other. All music uses the same hooks, melody, harmony, lyrics, etc.
If I remix a song that is somehow cheating but the person who created the song who borrowed everything is the "original" even though nothing is actually original. Did you know that many famous artists like the band Led Zeppelin just rewrote a bunch of old songs?
Considering you can't even come up with a legitimate reason to dislike AI pretty much proves your lack of critical thought and creativity. You are literally just acting like a corporate shill at this point.
This is not even going into how corporations use copyright and IP to abuse people and our society as a whole by rent seeking and creating value from nothing.
Do you seriously think that artificial scarcity and rent seeking improves the lives of artists? Do you have any idea that the majority of major musicians don't even own their own songs?
As I pointed out you seem to confuse art with commerce. Please educate yourself and stop the bullshit.
learn to punch up not down dweeb
you're gonna steal happily from a bunch of artists - teaching your silly LLMs to take their very income from them. fuck you. you probably have more prompts than any actual art.
the idea that you equivocate the algorithmic blender to the way an actual artist works is depressing, you're a sad fucking example of an artist, but honestly suspect you're just a liar.
you punch down gleefully and claim it doesn't matter because artists deserve it. get fucked.
You could give a shit about artists. You only care about the money. Well guess what, AI is all about the money.
Why do you think these AI companies aren't getting sued out of existence? It is because that is what big money wants. AI companies have made a mockery out of Intellectual property.
I am not upset about that in the slightest. I have lots of good reasons not to like AI.
it's not copying.
IT'S STEALING THE SKILLS OF THE ARTISTS, which is very much theft. when you take a concept artists entire portfolio and feed it to the LLM, and then it can spit out images mostly indistinguishable from the OG artist, that's not just depriving them of a sale here or there, it's saying "don't pay that artist, pay us instead!"
this is not a complex concept either. I don't give a fuck about individual lost sales, they aren't stealing the car, they're stealing the car factory.
All human culture exists through copying. I think you make an interesting point about "stealing" the means of production. This does seem what capitalists do. While I don't think stealing is the right word for this because it does not deprive the artist of their property, I think your point is still sound
Philosophically and legally it is a difficult concept honestly. This is why we are having a conflict. This is very new and also very disruptive technology.
Similar arguments have been made throughout history. For instance, painters were very upset with photographers "stealing" their livelihood with their fancy machines.
you're referring to apprenticeships and schooling - none of which is engineered to put the master craftspeople or teachers out of work.
it's not stealing their output, it's stealing the audience that might pay for that output, but crucially, not with the equivalent - it's always a poor imitation.
comparing it to photography is specious; painters benefited from photography - enabling them to paint portraits without having the subject sitting there, for one example. and crucially, the camera didn't cause water and (historical equivalent of electric lighting) whale oil prices to spike.
also why the FUCK are all these AI fanboys here? this is FUCK AI, fuck off if you don't understand
No, I am referring to all human knowledge and expression AKA our collective culture. You do realize that the arts existed long before the concept of copyright?
You seem to confuse art and expression with commerce. Art through drawing, painting, photography, singing, dancing, etc exists outside of money. In fact, the vast majority of art (99%) is never sold.
The fact that I hate AI but also despise copyright and other forms of Intectual Property is confusing to you.
There are a lot of good arguments against AI. Supporting rent seeking capitalists isn't one of them.