256
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

China has introduced a new measure to combat misinformation, requiring influencers sharing information on sensitive topics to hold a degree in that area.

The rule, which came into effect on 25 October under the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), is reportedly aimed at reducing online misinformation and protecting social media users from potentially harmful advice or guidance.

Influencers discussing subjects such as medicine, law, education, or finance must provide proof of their expertise, whether through a professional licence or degree. Platforms including Douyin (China's version of TikTok), Bilibili, and Weibo are tasked with verifying these credentials.

The CAC has also banned advertising for medical products and services, such as health foods and supplements, in an effort to curb promotions disguised as educational content.

So you're saying I can't continue promoting dick pills that might cause people's organs to boil? alex-no-supplements

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 49 points 3 months ago

I'm really torn here between "this is unbelievably based and would do incalculable good if applied worldwide, and in fact if this were done in the U.S. 20 years ago we'd be living in an entirely different future" and being big butt mad because I have a lot of opinions and hate being shut up. Also even though i'm just a biology degree dropout that doesn't mean I know nothin, yknow

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 51 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

i'm not sure how much of a difference it would make over here, given that higher education is expensive you'd just see a different, nerdier flavor of bougie propaganda

also the fact that college is liberal (No No The Other Liberal) indoctrination

[-] SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net 44 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don't think this new measure exists to shut up regular folks and not allow them to have an opinion on something. This is clearly targeted at people with large followings who claim to be experts or gurus. Influencers.

[-] TheWolfOfSouthEnd@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 3 months ago

At what point do you crossover from “regular folk” to “influencer”?

[-] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 21 points 3 months ago

I think reasonable people will disagree about what point that is, but it doesn't seem reasonable to suggest that the point doesn't exist.

[-] PunishedWeezing@hexbear.net 20 points 3 months ago

1,000 followers

[-] Corridor8031@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

are you an influencer tho? i mean it says influencers not everyone, or is this just marketing

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 17 points 3 months ago

I like to think I influence with my powerful posts

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
256 points (100.0% liked)

news

24592 readers
569 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS