224

I keep finding clips of him on twitter and the man was absolutely vile; I never watched his stuff before, watching it now I see he really was a hateful piece of trash.

I'm not shedding a tear over someone taking out the trash.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dead@hexbear.net 123 points 9 months ago

His whole debate schtick was fake. All of media is saying that he encouraged discussion or welcomed people to politics, none of which is true. Charlie manufactured scenarios where he could bully unprepared people to promote far right propaganda.

He sits in a booth with a microphone to present himself as the expert, giving him advantage in the conversation. He chooses unprepared college students from campus who are between classes. Then if someone proves that he's wrong, he just won't upload the video. There was no real debates.

[-] AF_R@hexbear.net 12 points 9 months ago

The weirdest part is how the majority of people look at his debates, watch the whole thing, and conclude Kirk won.

Like, literally the second last thing he said was “too many” in response to how many trans mass shooters there were? How is that an acceptable response in a scholarly debate?

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
224 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14399 readers
646 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS